Dear Reader_________________________________________

If you still have questions regarding Maria Hora after reading "Apparitions and Mystics - True of False" hear is a very short but powerful report. We investigated this first hand in Portugal.

Only twenty miles from Fatima in Portugal arises a new seer. Maria Conceicao Hora, received visions, had a bloody cross appear on her forehead, and grabbed communion hosts out of the air.

She says that these communion hosts are brought to her by angels from all the tabernacles in the world where they are not worshipped correctly. She then proceeded to use a consecrated Host around her neck on a chain.

She had a cross on her wall start bleeding from the eyes, head, hands and feet. The Church investigated her messages, claims, and the cross. In taking some of the blood from the cross to a lab, they found that it was real human blood, but that it was mixed in with the saliva of a leach. This is when the Church made the determination that it was fraud or demonic. The demons cannot create blood out of nothing as God can, but they can do anything that we can do, but they can do it instantly and inviseably. They can take blood out of a human with the use of a leach and press it onto a cross. But God does not need to resort to these means, He creates out of nothing.

And of course, using the Eucharist as a charm is the most sacrilegious thing you can do. The Church demanded that she stop the practice, and she did not. "God told her" and therefore she would rather obey God than man. We are sorry to say this, but that is the sickness of all who follow false apparitions.

In 1962 her visions were condemned and she was excommunicated for practicing witchcraft and misusing sacraments [the Eucharist]. In Fatima announcements are posted warning pilgrims "to abstain from visiting Ladeira de Pinheiro even out of simple curiosity." Masses are forbidden by outside priests. She and her followers continue. They would rather obey God than man, meaning obey the false seer instead of the Church. See 1 Tim. 3:15.

Of course, the only reason we bring up this seer is to show the extremes Satan will go to ape God. Fatima has always had THE BLUE ARMY. The Blue Army is a world wide organization of people who use the Rosary as their sword. It was started because of the messages of Fatima.

Horta's visions are the catalyst for a new army aping the Blue Army. THE WHITE ARMY was started up by Madame A. Buffe to spread the messages of Horta. Can any greater example of aping be found?

This is not fraud. There is a great deal of evidence of the Satanic. Even Madame Buffe goes into ecstasy. Anne Cillis watched and listened to her in ecstasy and testifies:

"It was not faked, and it was awful. Her voice changed. I'm sure it was demonic. She is greeting the angel of death and telling him how wonderful he is."

"I have witnessed this myself. Not with this woman, but with others. It cannot be mistaken in anyway for fraud, and it cannot be from God." said Rick Salbato.

One of the many Satanic sacrileges committed by the followers of Horta is to imitate her by wearing the White Army Locket containing a consecrated host. They claim this takes the place of the scapular. This is very much like the Black Mass.

The imitation [aping] of the Blue Army, Fatima and the Fatima message should be obvious. The location of the seer, alone, should be a warning sign. God would not draw attention away from Himself. We cannot emphasize enough that prayer said for the wrong intention [the intentions of a demonically inspired seer] are worthless, even if these messages bring us to the Mass and the Rosary.

We think it is important to add here that promotion of any apparition that does not have Church approval is a sin. This has always been the case in the Church, and was re-stated by the Vatican in the following document of November 1996.

November 1996

2. Regarding the circulation of texts of alleged private revelations, the Congregation states:

1. The Interpretation given by some individuals to a Decision approved by Paul VI on 14 October 1966 and promulgated on 15 November of that year, in virtue of which writings and messages resulting from alleged revelations could be freely circulated in the Church, is absolutely groundless. This decision actually referred to the "abolition of the Index of Forbidden Books" and determined that --- after the relevant censures were lifted --- the moral obligation still remained of not circulating or reading those writings which endanger faith and morals.
2. In should be recalled however that with regard to the circulation of texts of alleged private revelations, canon 623 #1 of the current Code remains in force: "the Pastors of the Church have the … right to demand that writings to be published by the Christian faithful which touch upon faith or morals be submitted to their judgement".
3. Alleged supernatural revelations and writings concerning them are submitted in first instance to the judgement of the diocesan Bishop, and , in particular cases, to the judgement of the Episcopal Conference and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.