World War III – When, How
Richard Salbato, 1-7-2009
Right from the beginning I will say that I believe we are already in World War III or it will start within the year. For years now hundreds of prophesies have warned that if we do not repent of our sins and do penance, the justice of God will have to replace His Mercy.
I now believe it is too late to avoid this coming purification of sin, chastisement, cleansing, or whatever you want to call it. My last article – The Great War is in God's Family explains the reason or the “Why” of this purification. It is Catholic bishops, priests, nuns and laity, who have chosen to disregard the teachings of the Church on faith, morals and worship.
When will the war start?
When it comes to prophesy, it is never possible to know the time of anything. The prayers of the saints can postpone things, and sins can make them come quicker. The only way to guess at the timing is to look at the world situation as it is now and how fast it evolved to where it is now. Before putting deductive reasoning to work, we have to look at what cannot happen, what has to happen, what might happen, and then see logically what is most likely to happen.
Four years ago I wrote about World War III, and just who wants this war, so I only need to add some comments to that article here to see if the time is now. See Who Wants World War III?
The Grand Philosopher of Scottish Rite Masonry, Albert Pike, together with Italian Illuminati leader Mazzini, planned three world wars to be deliberately perpetrated by the Illuminati in order to facilitate world government under the guise of promoting peace.
1. World War I would "advance
Communism and destroy the czarist Russian regime;" that did indeed happen,
except that it backfired on the Illuminati since
2. World War II was "to
3. The third world war is meant to "pit Judaism against the Muslim world." The acceptable solution [they hoped] to the global chaos they instigated would be world government.  This backfired on them in the six day war, and they underestimated how such a small country could hold off the entire Muslim world.
In the past year the Illuminati had a secret Bilderberg conference
In spite of this, McCain was leading by 10 points 80 days before the election. Then suddenly something happened that no one expected, the market crashed by 40% in one week, going at first from a high of 15000 to 7500 and remained below 9000 throughout the election. Even if justified, that much of a drop has to be manipulated by people with massive amounts of money. The timing of that crash is just too political. (Note 1)
Even if it is not true, Americans always blame the sitting President for the economy. The power of money belongs to the house and senate, and yet people always blame the President, who has no real power over economics. It was no longer possible for McCain to win because people always vote their pocket book.
Although the selections of Obama for his cabinet seems kind of middle of the road, one thing all of these people have in common is that they all are members of the FPA and the secret Bilderburg group.
I am not a conspiracy theorist. I know that these people will never win in the long run, but I do not discount what they have tried to do and still want to do to control the world. My sadness is that Catholics have fallen into their traps.
What the Illuminati and Communism have in common, is Pantheism because it offers a concept of man which, on religious grounds, subordinates the individual to the collective. It also subverts God-centered religion by making religion man-centered. Pantheism denies the existence of God by identifying Him with the universe so that the world becomes the only reality.
Hence naturalism flows from pantheism, and both doctrines
aid the spread of political collectivism, giving it "theological"
justification. In pantheism and collectivism the individual and private
property are absorbed in the collective, and self-worship assumes the name of
universal love, to which individuals are to be pitilessly sacrificed. This is why the Illuminati supported the
concept of Communism and helped Lenin take over
This is also why the Illuminati supported the Communist United Nations. The basic Marxist plank found in the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights and the Soviet Constitution is that man is "primarily an economic creature: his material well-being is all important; his privacy and freedom are strictly secondary considerations." And so the government must take "full responsibility for the welfare of the people" and "assume control of all their activities".
The remnants of
Communism, talked about in
The object of the lie of “Global Warming” is to suppress third world countries and protect the dwindling supply of oil for themselves. (Note 3)
I digress. We are talking about the “WHEN” of World War III. Based on what I have described above, it has
to be now and it may have started already.
How will World War III start?
We are not talking about war here but about prophesy. Prophesy speaks of a world wide war involving every nation in the world. That being said, how can we have a world wide war?
Could it be the Moslems attacking the free world? Not a chance! They could not last a week against the free world.
Could it be
It might start by
some natural disaster like a super volcanic eruption in
The Illuminati or Communists (same thing) do not want nuclear war because what they want is the world’s natural resources, oil, gas, water, steel, gold, etc. They want to get rid of people by birth control, abortion, civil wars, but at the same time they want to protect, what they think belongs to them, the earth.
Years ago (30 years) I concluded that the only thing that would match the 101 prophesies about the coming cleansing would be International Simultaneous Civil Wars.
There is only one thing that could cause ISCWs and that is a World Wide Economic Collapse.
I wrote about this in 2002: World Wide Economic Collapse
The most compelling reason that I know it will be economic, is that money is our sin. In this last election we chose money over life. Since we blamed Republicans for the October crash of the economy, we voted for the most pro-death candidate in history, we picked money over life, over the commandments of God.
If you read Tan Books’ “HELL” or “An Unpubished Manuscript on Purgatory” you will see that God’s justice is always according to the greatest sin. If your sin is sloth, your punishment will be related to sloth, and if it is money it will be related to money. We picked money over the commandment of God, “Thou shall not kill”, and this is the punishment God will give to us. As we sow, so shall we reap.
In the past 90 days the economies of each and every country
has fallen an average of 42%, with
A crash can happen in time with its own weight of debt or
something can make it happen overnight like a cut off of the world’s oil supply
through the Straights of Hormuz, which borders
Why then would an economic crash cause civil wars? More and more thoughout Europe and now even
When money is worthless, when people cannot buy food, when power is turned off because the Government cannot pay workers, when businesses close because they cannot buy products, then people will go to the streets and take whatsoever they see and need. Anyone who has anything, will do whatsoever they have to in order to protect what they have.
In the end more people will die from civil wars than any
other kind as has been proved by history.
Just look at
According to prophesy more than half (some ¾) of the world will die before there is peace once again.
Will there be peace in the end?
Yes! Our Lady of Fatima said: “In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph and there will be a period of peace.” In fact, other prophesies have said that this will be one of the most peaceful times in the history of the world, where even work will be easier, and the Church will be the major power of the world again.
Our Lady of America promised that if we
placed Her statue in the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, in
How can we possibly come to this peace? For 30 years now I have questioned one thing, because that one thing explains what this peace means: “What is the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart?” I have an entire section of many articles on this subject but never became sure of what it would mean. Mary's Triumph?
I do know that Satan wanted to get rid of Catholic Nations
and did that in World War I. He wanted
to get rid of Catholic Colonialism in Asia and
I think all these things must return including the Holy
Roman Emperor, and the natural law taught by the Catholic Church and imposed on
the Nations. I believe this Holy Roman
Emperor (with the help of
Because of many prophesies, I also
believe this Holy Roman Emperor and
Note 1: Joseph Farah,
Why is it that Emanuel and other members of the Obama administration seem downright giddy about the collapse of our economy? Could it be more than the fact that it led them to power? Do they believe they can use this crisis to push through unconstitutional, immoral and draconian anti-freedom measures that will help them maintain control and power under the cover of crisis?
And, if so, is it possible this dire economic calamity was at least partly engineered by insiders from the beginning – for the purpose of enriching the elite and turning the rest of us into serfs?
I'm beginning to open my mind to just such a possibility.
It is certainly not without precedent. Way back in 1928, Edward Bernays wrote in his work, "Propaganda," the following: "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power in our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."
Is there any doubt in your mind there is at least some truth to that statement? Is there any doubt in your mind that we can see at least some truth in that statement in American society today?
Could we have been manipulated into this financial crisis for economic gain and political power for the few? Just do some serious reading about the Great Depression if you have any doubts.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who works so well with Republicans and Democrats alike, worked with Goldman Sachs for more than two decades before ascending to his government position – and taking a huge pay cut in the process. If anyone was in a position to be one of the architects of this disaster, it was he.
He earned some $800 million during his years with Goldman
Sachs. Why does someone give up that kind of wealth to become a federal
government bureaucrat? Is he, in fact, still doing the bidding of his former
cronies at the expense of
By the end of last month, Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had engineered loans, pledges and guarantees of more than $7.4 trillion to the financial elite that was responsible for creating the economic crisis in which we find ourselves today:
· March 11: $200 billion in loans to financial institutions
· March 16: $29 billion in loans to J.P. Morgan Chase
· July 30: $300 billion housing bill
· Sept. 7: $200 billion for the U.S. Treasury to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
· Sept. 16: $85 billion to AIG and $70 billion injected into the financial system
· Sept. 19: $50 billion pledged to support Money Market funds
Sept. 29: $150 billion made available to
· Oct. 3: $700 billion in Paulson's bailout package
· Oct. 7: $1.3 trillion in purchase debt from companies
· Oct. 8: $38 billion in additional loans to AIG
· Oct. 14: $1.4 trillion in FDIC guarantees of interbank loans
· Nov. 24: $20 billion loaned to Citigroup with the Treasury Department assuming responsibility for 90 percent of Citigroup's $306 billion in debt
· Nov. 25: $600 billion in loans for mortgage-backed assets and $200 billion in loans for consumer-backed assets
There's likely a lot more of this on the way.
Is any of it working? Is the economy better off today than it was before this spending spree? If you want an answer, just try getting a loan.
I don't like conspiracy theories, but we sure have a lot of people in positions of power who see crises as opportunities.
They don't mean opportunities for you.
They mean opportunities for them.
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child makes it an offense for parents to teach their children reverence for their religion as this fosters "religious discrimination". This explains the multi-cultural indoctrination of children in schools today, even Catholic schools. Yet parents can't object, as non-compliance could be interpreted as child abuse under the article on religious freedom for children.
The UN intends to impose, by international law, population control by means of abortion, sterilization, contraception, sex education and homosexuality.
The phrase 'new world order' traces back
at least as far as 1940, when author H.G. Wells used it as the title of a book
about a socialist, unified, one-world
government. The phrase has also been linked to American presidents,
including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the
"A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment," said Bush before a joint session of Congress. "Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: A new era … in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony."
The phrase "New World Order" causes alarm for many Americans, particularly those concerned about an international governing body trumping U.S. sovereignty or those that interpret biblical prophecy to foretell the establishment of a one-world government as key to the rise of the Antichrist. Conspiracy theorists, too, have latched on to the phrase, concerned that powerful financial or government figures are secretly plotting to rule the world.
Kissinger's ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what "new world order" might actually mean.
"There is a need for a new world order," Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, "I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system."
As WND reported, Kissinger was also part of last year's super-secret Bilderberg Group, an organization of powerful international elites, including government, business, academic and journalistic representatives, that has convened annually since 1954.
According to sources that have penetrated the high-security meetings, the Bilderberg meetings emphasize a globalist agenda and promote the idea that the notion of national sovereignty is antiquated and regressive.
CNBC's Haines concluded the Kissinger interview by asking, "Are you confident about the people President-elect Obama has chosen to surround him?"
Kissinger replied, "He has appointed an extraordinarily able group of people in both the international and financial fields."
More than 31,000
scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as
atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of
other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global
warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is
damaging Earth's climate.
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
The late Professor
Frederick Seitz, the past president of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences
and winner of the National Medal of Science, wrote in a letter promoting the
petition, "The United States is very close to adopting an international
agreement that would ration the use of energy and of technologies that depend
upon coal, oil, and natural gas and some other organic compounds."
"This treaty is, in our opinion, based upon flawed ideas. Research data on climate change do not show that human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful," he wrote.
Accompanying the letter sent to scientists was a 12-page summary and review of research on "global warming," officials said.
"The proposed agreement would have very negative effects upon the technology of nations throughout the world, especially those that are currently attempting to lift from poverty and provide opportunities to the over 4 billion people in technologically underdeveloped countries," Seitz wrote.
Robinson said the project targets scientists because, "It is especially important for
He said the "global warming agreement," written in
"Yet," he said, "the United Nations and other vocal political interests say the
"The inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness include the right of access to life-giving and life-enhancing technology. This is especially true of access to the most basic of all technologies: energy. These human rights have been extensively and wrongly abridged," he continued. "During the past two generations in the U.S., a system of high taxation, extensive regulation, and ubiquitous litigation has arisen that prevents the accumulation of sufficient capital and the exercise of sufficient freedom to build and preserve needed modern technology.
"These unfavorable political trends have severely damaged our energy production, where lack of industrial progress has left our country dependent upon foreign sources for 30 percent of the energy required to maintain our current level of prosperity," he said. "Moreover, the transfer of other
"The necessary hydrocarbon and nuclear energy production technologies have been available to
He told WND he believes the issue has nothing to do with energy itself, but everything to do with power, control and money, which the United Nations is seeking. He accused the U.N. of violating human rights in its campaign to ban much energy research, exploration and development.
November 11, 1918.
Charles I, of Austria-Hungary, the last Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, was
forced to step down. It was on this day that the
In its place was substituted the
humanistic New World Order, first through the
So important was the role played by the Emperor in the politico-religious defense of the Church, that as late as 1903 he was allowed to veto a papal candidate. It's interesting that the veto exercised by Franz Joseph I that year allowed the election of the last Pope who has been elevated to the Sainthood, Pius X. 
So important was the position of the Emperor that he was prayed for in the Mass on appropriate occasions and in the great litany of intercessions on Good Friday. This was done right up until the 1950s.
"O God, protector of all
kingdoms and especially of the Christian Empire, grant that Thy servant, our
Emperor. N., may wisely foster the triumph of Thy, power, so that he whom Thou
hast made Prince may always be mighty in Thy service."
The Secret, says Fr. Harrison, "reminds us of the Emperor's duty to guard the peace and liberty of Christendom as the powerful 'arm' of the Most High," as "to serve God in peace is the supreme freedom of man":
"Let us pray for our most
Christian Emperor N., that our Lord and God may bring all barbarous nations
under his authority, for the sake of our perpetual peace. Omnipotent and eternal
God, . . . look graciously upon the
Once the "secular right
arm" of the Church disbanded, as Fr. Harrison notes, other "secular
substitutes such as the League of Nations and the United Nations" were
finally able "to persuade the papacy that they, and not the old