From a new and great web site in Australia
http://members.tripod.co.uk/jloughnan/weave.htm
The Knights of Saint John
and
Our Lady of the Rosary Home School
"Oh What A Web They Weave..."
When "John" the web-master of "Ecclesia Militans"[1] web-site attempted to dominate the "Fidei
Catholicae" list[2] (a site that was/is faithful
to the magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church), but, in the course of doing so, by
stating that of the "Novus Ordo Missae" (the new rite of Mass) "it is
invalid", "sinful to attend it", and it "is an aid to the heresy of
ecumenism" - he simply progressed along his chosen path towards (at least) proximate
heresy. In effect, he accuses the post-Conciliar popes of heretically imposing a form of
liturgy which was totally useless for the faithful - in fact, idolatrous; for, according
to him, present day Catholics who attended the new Mass were committing sacrilege and
simply partaking of common bread and wine, not the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our
Lord, Jesus Christ.
That he does not hold the same Faith as Catholics who are faithful to the magisterium is
further evidenced in his editorial statement in "Ecclesia Militans" that:
"This site is dedicated to spreading, and defending, the One True Religion founded
by Christ. Our ministry will deal mainly with the Conciliarists, in an attempt to bring
them back into the Fold of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation."
For the benefit of those who are unaware - when he refers to "Conciliarists"
who, he declares, are NOT now in the Fold of Christ - he refers precisely to those
Catholics who are faithful to the magisterium, that is, to the Pope and the bishops in
communion with him. And, for "John", those who ARE now "inside the Fold of
Christ and who are defending the One True Religion" founded by Christ are "Traditionalists".
To precisely which sect of the self-styled "Traditionalists" he subscribes is
uncertain, for he does not have the courage to identify his sect, simply claiming to be
"Catholic". He may be an adherent to any one of the SSPX, SSPV, CMRI, OSJ, St
Benedict Center-ites, Duarte Costa-ites, Thuc-ites, followers of the several anti-popes
such as Pius XIII, etc., Old Catholics, or a variety of "Independent" priests of
valid or uncertain validity. We are asked to entrust our souls to HIS judgement. My
"gut-feeling" is that he is an "OSJ/Wathenite"; a resident of the USA
should be able easily to establish the truth of the matter. [3]
When I accused this "John" (who was on the Forum under the name
"TradCath") of duplicity and evasion he fiercely claimed that he was being
slandering with lies. The initial and main problem that I had with him was that I
intensely dislike dealing with people who misrepresent or lie - who hide behind anonymity
and who, in truth, appear to despise their own name to the point where they will not only
hide behind a pseudonym but will actually deny their own name. What chutzpah! Furthermore,
from this anonymous base they feel free to slander the Pope, bishops in union with him,
the liturgy, and the laity in union with them. From around 10,000 miles away in Australia
I have since established, among other things, that his name is John Brindle (he may
even be John Paul Brindle)[4]. When I disclosed
this fact he was so rattled that he called me a jerk, an idiot, asked me if I had
graduated from kindergarten, etc. After being chided for his evasion, what did he do? He
briefly edited the ownership of "Ecclesia Militans" from "John" to
"John Newman"! - and then quickly (but not quickly enough) changed it back to
"John". Fortunately, I kept a copy of the "John Newman" page.
I joined the "Sacred Heart" list[5] as an
observer. Membership entitled me to peruse the Members List; it was there that I
discovered that John Brindle (email address militantis@hotmail.com) had obtained recent
active membership of the list on Oct. 3, 1999 (although Mike Malone later advised that
John Brindle initially took membership about two years ago.) The list was moderated by
Mike Malone.[6] Many of his files are listed on John
Brindle's web-site and, some on David Brindle's "In Hoc Signo Vinces."[7]
The "Sacred Heart" list mainly consists of a mixture so-called
"Feeneyites"[9] who have reconciled with the
Church and those who have not yet done so, for example, the "St Benedict Center"
at Richmond, New Hampshire.[10] There appears to be
fraternization between the people, but not the religious.
It has to be a given that John Brindle did NOT attempt to deceive the "Sacred
Heart" list moderator, Mike Malone in his application to join that List; after all,
Mike Malone KNEW John Brindle personally. [9] It then
has to be a given that he DID attempt to deceive when he altered his website ownership
name on "Ecclesia Militans" from "John" to "John Newman".[11]
Further information was obtained from a person associated with the "St Benedict
Center" (who knows and has met the Brindles at two CFN conferences). This person
states that the "correct name" of the owner of "Ecclesia Militans" is
"John Paul Brindle, son of Robert Brindle and brother of David. John Paul is
an outstanding young man (only 17 or 18)..."[12]
That still has to be confirmed, but whichever way you go, John Brindle has attempted
deception with either the "Sacred Heart" list or his own web-site and the
"Fidei Catholicae" List. All I was looking for was a bit of truthfulness.
During the course of my "discussions" with
"John"/"TradCath", I mentioned the web-site "In Hoc Signo
Vinces" which is operated by David Brindle. David describes himself on his web-site
as follows:
- "David was born on August 18, 1976, in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He and his family started
out a little on the liberal side (i.e., Conciliar 'Catholics'), but as the years went by
and God's grace strengthened, they were finally brought over to the True Catholic Faith,
without which it is impossible to please God (Council of Trent)."
He continues: "His hobbies include apologetics and evangelization, converting
Protestants to the Catholic Faith, converting "catholics" to the Catholic Faith,
and amateur computer graphics."[13] (The inverted commas round "catholics" is as in the original!!!)
Note the similarity of expression regarding having been a "Conciliar
'Catholic'" - that is (according to him) those who are NOT members of the "True
Catholic Faith", and who are among the subjects of David's missionary activity of
"converting 'catholics' TO the Catholic Faith." Heady stuff! Note that
"David" also does the "no-name act" in NOT disclosing his surname.
Wonder why?
Note also the similarity in expression on the "Ecclesia Militans" site:
- "This site is dedicated to spreading, and defending, the One True Religion founded
by Christ. Our ministry will deal mainly with the Conciliarists, in an attempt to bring
them back into the Fold of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation."
This is a declaration that so-called "Conciliarists" (by which he means Roman
Catholics faithful to the Pope in Rome and the Bishops who are in union with him, and the
laity faithful to the Pope and their bishops) are NOT within the "Fold of
Christ".
Pursuant to that declared ambition, he recommends "Traditio"[14] - which includes a Mass Directory published by Fr.
M.E. Morrison, a man who is claimed by Terry Boyle[15]
to have been ordained in a Lutheran Church by a man who claimed to have been consecrated a
bishop in the Old Catholic sect.
Another source states: "Greetings! This is to inform you of Fr. Morrison's apostolic
succession. He was ordained by one Bishop Sebastian of the Society of Christ the King
(SSCR) in California. He was ordained and consecrated by Bishop John Simmons, who was
ordained and consecrated by Harold Norwood, who was ordained and consecrated by
Castillo-Mendez. Mendez was a Roman Catholic priest who was illicitly consecrated a bishop
by Bishop Costa of Brazil, a Roman Catholic bishop. Costa was a modernist who was
excommunicated by Pius XII! He consecrated Castillo-Mendez to help found a schismatic
Brazilian church, which has spread to several other countries. This is the glorious
line Fr. Morrison can boast of! His own bishop, Bishop Sebastian, "made a formal
abjuration of error and heresy, profession of faith and the oath against modernism"
on 16 April 1999. He claims to have returned the line to the Church by this. He explicitly
admitted that Simmons was a schismatic, hence the abjuration. Fr. Morrison is, without a
doubt, a real priest."[16] [17]
In a nutshell, "Traditio"'s orientation is opposed to the orientation of the
Pope, the magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church and those who are in communion with
them, and the liturgy of the Church.
David Brindle recommends: "Directory of Traditional Latin Masses for U.S. &
Canada [external link] Here is the most comprehensive listing of Traditional Masses
available. Perfect for those trying to find a Traditional Mass near where they live, as
well as for the intrepid traveler. All known Masses, including SSPX, Indult, SSPV, CMRI,
Independent, etc."[18] Apart
from the Indult Mass, all the rest are celebrated by either dissidents,
"independents", schismatics or excommunicants. Furthermore, this
recommendation is a de facto incitement to schism.
David writes on one of his favorite topics - EENS (Outside The Church There IS No
Salvation): but it is the rigorist interpretation of the Dogma that is not in line with
the Catholic Church's teaching, which is specifically dealt with in the Catechism of the
Catholic Church under "Outside The Church There Is No Salvation" in #846-8. This
same rigorist position is maintained by the "St Benedict Center" at Richmond,
New Hampshire, by Fr. James Wathen, OSJ, and by other fringe dissidents. My
"Sacred Heart" list contact states that:
- "As far as Fr. Wathen, OSJ is concerned, I do not know him, but only of him. I read
'Who Shall Ascend?' and only had a problem with a couple of statements in the book. For
example: no one who attends the Novus Ordo can save their soul. I know that he refuses
Communion to you if you attend an Indult Mass or the New Rite."
On September 27, 1999, Mr Matthew McSorley, Director of Communications, Diocese of
Manchester described the status of the "St Benedict Center" at Richmond, New
Hampshire as "canonically 'irregular'", citing the reason as being their operation
"in the diocese without the permission of the bishop and are running ministries
without the permission of the bishop and because they have no legitimate authority who has
oversight over them and to whom they are responsible."[19]
As mentioned in footnote 8 below, he quoted one of the points from "(now Auxiliary
Bishop) Francis J. Christian's" 1995 letter as "They continue to refuse to
accept the understanding of the formula, 'No Salvation Outside the Church.'"
Of Fr.Wathen, Franciscan Bro. Alexis Bugnolo (who is a true "traditionalist"
faithful to the magisterium) wrote:
- "It should be known that Fr. Wathen, though once a Roman Catholic priest, is no
longer. The Order he claims to belong to was supressed nearly 200 years ago, and the
branch to which Fr. Wathen belongs was sustained by laymen belonging to Protestant
organizations and Russian Orthodox laymen. It is entirely bogus and fraudulent. Fr.
Wathen therefore has no faculties to hear confession or confect any sacrament. Any
confession he hears is therefore invalid, as are his marriages. All the masses he says
are sacrileges, offered as they are without episcopal mandate. Likewise are all the
sacraments he confesses. "The Great Sacrilege" is therefore not the Novus Ordo
Mass--though it does have its problems--but rather the author of the book by that
title."[20]
David explained the "Doctrinal Position of IHSV [external link] Many people have
asked me 'what is the position of IHSV on Baptism of Desire?' We answer thus: 'about two
paces to the right of Father Feeney.' Here is the complete doctrinal position of IHSV,
brought to you through the courtesy of "St. Benedict Center" - THE Catholic
Crusade."
Then, by way of further interest, David (who at no time discloses his own surname)
complains about someone, who he declares to be a heretic and a
dishonest person, who he arbitrarily calls "Hello":
- "A Challenge of Faith - A Challenge Accepted IHSV goes to war in defense of the
dogma of Exclusive Salvation. In late November 1996, a heretic known only as 'Hello'
posted an evil piece of literature to the IHSV Guestbook, a most dishonest thing to do as
it disallows any response. However, in order to correct this problem we transferred the
entirety of 'Hello's' posting to our website for a thorough examination of his claims.
This item that he (she?) posted was a collection of statements from fathers, saints, etc.,
that were intended to 'disprove' the defined dogma NO SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH. After
careful examination, we uncover a web of deception, lies and trickery." [21]
Here, of course, we have a case of the kettle calling the pot black! Neither David
Brindle, John Brindle or Charles Hammer Goldsmith (more later) EVER disclose their
surnames on their web-sites! Not only that, but "David" lied: the posting by
"Hello" was not an attempt to 'disprove' the defined dogma NO SALVATION OUTSIDE
THE CHURCH. Rather it was obviously an attempt to disprove the warped conception of that
dogma espoused by "David" and company.
He further pits himself against the declaration of Pope John Paul II that Archbishop
Lefebvre and the bishops consecrated by him, and those who adhere to the SSPX schism are
excommunicated - and therefore outside the full communion with the Church and, of course,
subject to the defined EENS Dogma - no salvation! He writes:
- "Questions and Answers on the Society of Saint Pius X Is the Society of Saint Pius
X in schism (pronounced SIZ-um, not SKIZ-um)?[22] Here
is Bishop Williamson's December, 1995 letter to the SSPX. It is a series of Q's and A's
that people ask about the Society. Bishop Richard Williamson does a superlative job in
answering these (admittedly very good) questions. Does the SSPX recognize John Paul II as
Pope? What about the "excommunication?" etc."[23]
For David, the excommunicated schismatic SSPX Bishop Williamson is a better theologian and
authority than Pope John Paul II!
So, I think that I have been quite correct in contending that the Brindles have been
deceptive and evasive. But, there is more! Another example emerges. On Jan. 22, 2000, a
posting was made to the "Fidei Catholicae" list from "Sherry"[24] who coyly writes of the "Our Lady's Heavenly
Treasures" web-site:
- "Has anyone seen this website?
Posted by Sherry on January 23, 2000 at 19:59:31:
I surfed onto this page I thought it was neat. Here is the web address:
http://www3.50megs.com/olht/ Our Lady's Heavenly Treasures "
And, the pictures are, indeed, lovely! The web-site offers the facility to view "WHO
ARE WE AND WHAT DO WE DO?" Upon clicking on the option we find the following
ambiguous advice:
- Unfortunately, in today's society, it is very hard, and in some places impossible, to
obtain quality Catholic pictures at affordable prices. We are a Catholic organization,
whose apostolate is to promote devotion to Our Lord, the Angels, and the Saints by filling
this need."
Does THAT enlighten YOU as to who is behind this commercial site? All that is given as to
"Who are we?" is the claim that "We are a Catholic organization..." -
a claim that is made by countless organizations throughout the world - organizations which
may NOT be in communion with the Pope in Rome. All that is positively known is that orders
and the payment thereof are to be sent to:
"Our Lady's Heavenly Treasures, 1396 Barnes Road, Bardstown,
Kentucky 40004."
Hang on!!! That is the home address of Robert V. Brindle Jr, his wife and most of his
children, including David. Sherry L. Brindle, who lived at this address is now listed
at 117 Honeysuckle Ln, Bardstown, Ky.
Who would like to lay odds that Sherry, who was just "surfing the net", and
Sherry Brindle are not one and the same person? In fact Mike, the "Fidei
Catholicae" web-master advised that "TradCath", "TCA",
"Sherry" and "Sam" all had the same Internet Service Provider (the
last number being a variable.)
Why do people make these outrageous claims? Well, haven't they always? To-day, in
Australia, we have similar gnostics and claimants to un-orthodoxy, like "The
Magnificat Meal Movement", and "The Little Pebble" a.k.a. William Kamm, who
claimed to have been blessed by Pope John Paul II (and produces a picture of himself very
proximate to the Pope) - but which "proves" nothing. He also claims to be Peter
Romanus, Pope-in-waiting, blessed by Our Lady. I think it is prudent to remain skeptical -
and in union with one's pastor, bishop and pope!.[25]
Lastly, we come to a raving posting by a person with the e-mail name "TCA".[26]
One of the first postings of "TCA" to the "Fidei Catholicae" list was
on December 31, 1999 at 17:12:58: He rapturously promoted: "a fantastic WebSite for
Catholics!!!", and listed the hyperlink to - TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS - his
own web-site!
Right on cue, it seems, an unsolicited congratulatory message was posted by TradCath (John
Brindle) on December 31, 1999 at 18:47:52: saying "Great site!", and also
inserting a hyperlink to HIS own web-site "Ecclesia Militans: The Church Militant
Website!"
It almost appeared that "TradCath"/John Brindle had just discovered Hammer's
web-site!
A visit to "TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS" discloses the following facts:
Hammer gives a big rap to "THE SOVEREIGN ORDER OF ST. JOHN OF JERUSALEM, A TRULY
CATHOLIC ORDER WITH A FANATIC HISTORY" - an order that Bro. Alexis Bugnolo declared
to be bogus and fraudulent - that is, not in communion with the Pope.
He also recommends the usual demonstrably anti-Catholic files and sites, such as Fr.
Morrison's "Traditio", "Problems With The New Mass", "Why The New
Mass Is Deadly" by Brother Michael Dimond, O.S.B, St Benedict Center files on
the "Jews" (e.g. "The Church And The Jews", by Br. Thomas Mary,
M.I.C.M.), the Campos Declaration and other matters, files contrary to the Church's
teaching on EENS, etc. But there is something else! Here and there he rants about
- "These enemies of Christ's truth do not always lay outside Holy Mother Church but
also within. It is these heretics within the church that pose the GREATEST threat to the
souls."
and "3) Debates (With Heretics and Protestants): IN THIS SECTION WE PROVIDE SOME OF
OUR ON LINE DEBATES WITH HERETICS AND PROTESTANTS."
Precisely WHO are the Heretics and Protestants to be debated? He list two:
"Debates
(With Heretics and Protestants)
The live time Debate between the heretic "Catholic" Matt 16:18[27] and the traditional Roman Catholic apologist Charles the
Hammer, on the legitimacy of baptism of desire.
The live time Debate between the heretic "Catholic" webmaster Jim Vogel[28] and the traditional Roman Catholic apologist Romanist
(Otherwise known as David), on the Theory of baptism of desire and its legitimacy."
Note: "David" is none other than David Brindle, and Charles Hammer
classifies himself as "the traditional Roman Catholic", but his opponents are
only "heretic 'Catholic' "!
In another file (STEVERAY.TXT) he denounces as a heretic Steve Ray,[29]
Moderator of the Catholic Converts Board for the non-acceptance of his (the Hammer's) view
on EENS.
Again, in that self-congratulatory manner, Hammer writes:
- "Is Baptism of Desire Salvific?
Matt1618 vs The Hammer
THE HAMMER STRIKES HOME
In this debate Matt 1618 proved himself incompetent and unequal to challenge of
establishing his belief in Salvation through baptism of desire as truth. While The Hammer
did a fantastic job of defending the Defined Dogmas of Holy Mother Church on the necessity
of water baptism."
No modesty visible here but the most interesting part of the debate is the end where it
shows that the debates are under the auspices of:
Traditional Catholic Apologetics Webpage
Ecclesia Militans Webpage
In Hoc Signo Vinces Webpage.
Well, let me issue a challenge. If any of these three Webmasters, whose favorite
pastime appears to be calling other people heretics, can get any American Bishop who is in
union with Rome to endorse any one of the sites - then I will take up eating pumpkin!
Matt 1618 (who is faithful to the magisterium of the Catholic Church) gave me the
following advice regarding "TradCath"/John of "Ecclesia Militans":
- "This fellow was part of the Feenyite crowd that overwhelmed the Catholic Converts
board about a year ago, challenging me to a debate on the issue of No Salvation Outside
the Church. They talked so much how they wanted to cream me, and 'expose my errors', etc.
They wanted a live IRC, chat debate. I wanted a more formal structured debate, with
written opening statements, rebuttals, etc. I said I would go into a chat debate only if
they would agree to go to the more structured one. I debated a fellow named 'Hammer', an
associate of 'Trad', on that condition. Then, after the first debate, 'Trad' (i.e.
"TradCath") wanted to negotiate the conditions for the structured debate. After
an exchange of emails, I never heard from 'Trad' again. We exchanged emails in negotiation
of the terms of the debate, and then after a few, 'Trad' never responded again. So this
debate is off. I sent him several unanswered emails. This debate thing is off, and I will
never deal with those folks again. They never kept to their promise."
To which, I add my Amen.
There are two interesting side issues here: 1. every boy has a
daddy, and 2. anti-semitism
Mr Robert V. Brindle, Jnr is the father of David and Sherry
Brindle and, possibly, of John or John Paul Brindle, and others.
He is the Principal of "Our Lady of the Rosary Homeschool" in Bardstown. Ky.
On 3 Sept 1999 I e-mailed Mr Brindle, asking what was his ecclesiastical orientation;
under the diocesan system; SSPX; Duarte-Costa; Thuc?
He replied: "We do not fall into any of the categories you proposed..obedient to the
Pope...not with a diocesan system." "We have an Apostolic Blessing...(and)
ecclesiastical approval of His Eminence Eduard Cardinal Gagnon...not attached to the SSPX,
FSSP, or any other Society for that matter."
I asked to view the Apostolic Blessing and ecclesiastical approval on Sept 5, 1999, and
whether the school was under the approbation of the local ordinary, and "what order
of priests are associated with the school?"[30]
No reply.
On 27 Jan 2000 I rang Fr. Bill Medley, Pastor of the Roman Catholic Church, Bardstown.
"David" tells us that he was a Homeschool "Class of 95 graduate." But
Fr. Medley does not know the Brindles nor of the Homeschool at Bardstown.[31]
Furthermore, following his enquiries to Archbishop Thomas Cajetan Kelly, O.P., Archbishop
of Louisville, he wrote 18 Feb. 2000:
- "I have spoken with Archbishop Kelly regarding Our Lady of the Rosary School. He
confirmed what I assumed: the organization of Our Lady of the Rosary School has not
sought any approbation from our local ordinary nor is he aware of any approbation from the
Holy See."
I believe that these two boys and the girl may very well be the product of the "Our
Lady of the Rosary Homeschool", and if so, then I certainly would not recommend
that Homeschool to any Catholic desiring to remain in union with the Pope.
Mr Charles "the hammer" Goldstein - I assume that
Charles did not lie to the CARM List about his biography.
I make a guess: Charles Goldstein may be a grand-son or grand-nephew of the original Mr
David Goldstein, LL.D. of the Freedman/Goldstein letter of 10 Oct. 1954.
In any event, it is remarkable that Charles Goldstein should take up the cause of those
who associate with anti-semites. I refer to those St Benedict Center/OSJ/Feeneyites who
are demonstrably anti-semitic.
For a period the "Sacred Heart" list was a hive of anti-semitism - initiated by
Thomas Sparkes, who simply quoted from Mike Malone's "Apostolic Digest" and
other sources. As mentioned, a very large quantity of that material was sent to the
Archbishop of Melbourne for his information.
Both David Brindle and John Brindle have on their web-sites a link to one of the most
vilest hate page one could stumble across. Oh sure! It has a couple of very good graphics
on the Crucifixion - but delve deeper! The site? "Alfred Olsen's Website" -
otherwise known as "Holywar".[32]
What strikes so many people as being odd is the number of people or groups calling
themselves "catholics" who attack the Roman Catholic Church headed on earth by
Pope John Paul II. It is not really "odd", but it really IS "sad" that
it always has been so; even Our Lord was deserted by some of the "catholics' of His
time - those disciples and followers who left Him when He said that it would be necessary
for them to eat His flesh and drink His blood for them to possess eternal life. So it has
been over time. A practical way to see the effect of these schisms is to see an incomplete
record of independent (that is, independent of Rome) Churches which contain
"catholic" or "roman catholic" in their title. You may view that list
of:
SOME CHURCHES NOT IN UNION WITH ROME
WHICH USE "CATHOLIC" OR "ROMAN CATHOLIC"
IN THEIR NAME, and
SOME SEDEVANANTISTS and
CATHOLICS NOT IN OBEDIENCE TO POPE JOHN PAUL II
Now, this is not a general condemnation of "Wathenites",
"OSJites", "Feeneyites" - I know and respect many of the former, and
freely acknowledge that many of them are in full communion with the Catholic Church, and
that they have fine intellectual minds. No. It is a protest against the "false
prophets" who see themselves possessing finer minds (intellectually, morally and
spiritually) than the post conciliar popes, the bishops in union with them - the
magisterium of the Church. In effect, these people are Jeremiahs - believing that the
gates of hell HAVE prevailed against the Church instituted by Jesus Christ and that THEY
possess a gnosis and ARE the "True Church". In fact, they are just modern-day
"protest"-ants! May Almighty God have mercy on them and grant them a happy
return to their mother. Amen.
Footnotes
- Ecclesia Militans; URL
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/6480/
Webmaster: "John", "John Newton", then "John"
Nick-name:"TradCath"
Name provided for Sacred Heart Forum membership: "John Brindle"
e-mail addresses used by "John"/"John
Brindle"/"Tradcath"/"John Newton": militantis@hotmail.com and
mititantis@mailcity.com
e-mail address, name and home-town provided to "Amazon Books" for review
of Fr. J. Wathen's "The Great Sacrilege": "John (militantis@hotmail.com
Bardstown, Kentucky"
ISP - as advised by moderator Fidei Catholicae Forum: 209.215.181.X (the "X"
variables being 86, 87, 107, 108)
- Quote from John Brindle 12 Jan 2000 Fidei Catholicae list in response to
questions:"
"...I reject the Novus Ordo for several reasons, among which are the following:
1. Because it is invalid.
2. Because it is sinful to attend it.
3. Because it is not conducive to piety and the honor and glory of God.
4. Because it was built upon, and is an aid to, the heresy of ecumenism."
"Q.2...what is one thing makes it invalid?
A. The new Consecration formula (i.e. 'For all') makes the Novus Ordo invalid."
What makes the above all the more curious is that it is an apparent 180 degree
"advance" from a position held and publicized in 1997 - but offering none of the
1997 "reasons":
- From his "PROFESSION OF FAITH" (Copyright 1997):
"...- we reject:
The New Mass, not because it is invalid, but because it is unfitting to the honor due
Christ: whether in Latin or in the vernacular, since "it represents, both as a whole
and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Holy mass as it
was formulated in Session XXIII of the Council of Trent" (Letter of Cardinals
Ottaviani and Bacci to Paul VI, 5/10/69). In fact the new Order of Mass obscures the
expressions intended to underline the Eucharistic dogmas, bringing the Mass close to the
Protestant supper and not accentuating the clear profession of the Catholic Faith. The New
Moral Theology - subjective, opportunistic, contaminated by permissive liberalism, in
little or nothing constitutes a sin." Profession of
Faith
- The Fidei Catholicae URL was
http://www.catholicae.org/board1/?noframes This site ultimately closed down, but has
recently re-emerged with the URLs http://www.catholicae.org
and http://216.71.154.58
- Q. "Do you attend the Traditional Mass that was approved by JPII in 1988 or one
that is not approved by the Church?" (FC question from "Fogel")
Note the half answer - he replies only to the first part of the
question:
A. "No, I do not attend an Indult Mass." (Posted by TradCath on January 12, 2000
at 20:27:03;)
Q. "Are you an adherent to the ideas of Fr. James Wathen, OSJ and do you attend Mass
at one of the centers operated by that body?" (FC question from John Loughnan.)
A. "Insofar as attending Mass at one of the mass canters of the OSJ goes, that's
really none of your business. As far as my being an 'adherent to the ideas of Fr. James
Wathen,' many of the doctrines/beliefs which Father Wathen believes in are true, hence I
agree with many of them. Not because they are the opinions of Father Wathen, but because
they are the truth." (Posted by TradCath on January 13, 2000 at 12:24:47;)
Hence, John Brindle has posted on his "Ecclesia Militans"
site only those files relative to the OSJ/Fr. James Wathen with which he agrees?
- I received information from a member of the Sacred Heart list that "the 'Ecclesia
Militans' webmaster is a young man, John Paul Brindle, and that he is the son of Robert V.
Brindle and brother of David Brindle." I have not yet been able to verify that
allegation. My informant claims to know and have met the Brindles at CFN conferences.
- Sacred Heart List - An egroups
list:
e-mail: sacred-heart@egroups.com
URL: http://www.egroups.com/list/sacred-heart
(Members can read and post messages here.)
Founding Moderator: Michael (Mike) Malone (R.I.P.)
One of the stated aims of the group is:
"We adhere to the teachings of the Holy Father the Pope when teaching ex
cathedra (emphasis added) and to the magisterium of the Church. We accept and
believe all Roman Catholic dogma including Extra Ecclesiam, Nulla Salus (there is no
salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church) and champion those who do likewise especially
Father Feeney, now deceased."
Mr Malone rejected the rigorist "Feeneyite" interpretation, but many of his
members do not! - they reject the concepts of baptisn of Blood and Desire!
Furthermore, at John
Brindle's website http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/6480/catholics.html
, we find the following:
"The Only Begotten
"'baptism' of desire? Say no more! In this work Mr. Michael Malone completely
devastates this theory. The result of over thirty years of research and work on the part
of Mr. Malone on the subject of 'baptism' of desire, this tremendous book proves beyond a
doubt that the Sacrament of Baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation. With over 4,000
citations and 455 pages worth of material, this is by far the largest addition to our site
yet. And as such, we have made it available for download as a .zip file, in .rtf format.
661k. We highly recommend that our readers purchase the book in its paper-back format from
Catholic Treasures, this is by far one of the greatest additions that any Catholic can
make to his library."
I think it fair to say that this group is basically anti-semitic. In a period of two days,
one of the members, Thomas Sparks, was allowed to post grossly anti-semitic material which
I have saved in a file of some 247,109 bytes, and which was onforwarded to the Archbishop
of Melbourne, George Pell.
Thomas Sparks has indicated his
intended URL will be http://www.geocities.com/thomassparks
His e-mail address is: sparksthomas@hotmail.com
and tommythelesser@mailcity.com
- Michael (Mike) Malone,
founding moderator of Sacred-Heart list.
URL http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2591/index.htm
Some of Malone's writings to be found on John Brindles
"Ecclesia Militans" site include:
"Apostolic
Digest", Sacred Heart Press, 1987,
"The
Once Chosen People Are Now The Accursed Race."
"Credo.
Foundations Of Faith Part I and II"
"Evolution"
"The
Errors Of The Laisneyites"
"The Case
Concerning Catholic Contraception"
"The Only
Begotten"
"Some Explicit
Errors of Vatican Council II", Sacred Heart Press
I think that is "no less than than 5"?
- David Brindle URL http://www.ihsv.com
After a 3 year hiatus, he declares: "I'm back"!
"In Obedience to the decrees of Pope Urban VIII and other Pontiffs, we declare that
we submit the entire contents of this website without reserve to the judgement of
the Apostolic See of the Holy Roman Catholic Church." Obviously, he is less
keen for the judgement of his local Bishop who, as a legitimate successor of the Apostles,
has the right and duty in this matter! Are there any prizes for guessing why?
- The name "Feeneyite" is considered to be a perjorative term by some, but a
badge of honor by others.
- St Benedict Center, New Hampshire http://www.catholicism.org
The SBC, New Hampshire claims to being in communion with Rome, stating: "We are in
communion with the Holy Father because we are baptized Catholics who hold the Catholic
faith.", and more. (cf. Saint
Benedict Center's Status in the Catholic Church)
On the other hand, just as the letter from The Holy Office, 8 August 1949 wrote:
"That is why it is inexplicable that the St Benedict Center should claim to be
a Catholic group and desire to be considered as such whilst not conforming to the
prescripts of canons 1381 and 1382 of the Code of Canon Law and continuing to be a
cause of discord and of rebellion against the ecclesiastical authority and of disturbance
for many consciences."
- so, too has the appropriate authority, the Archdiocese of Manchester stated in a letter
of 29 September 1999:
"The St Benedict Center is located in Richmond, NH, and is therefore within the
boundaries of the Diocese of Manchester. However, the Center is in a canonically
'irregular' status with the Bishop of Manchester. Basically, the Center refuses to operate
within the authority of the bishop and, therefore, operates outside the legitimate
authority of the church. There are two reasons for this, outlined in a 1995 letter written
by then Msgr. (now Auxiliary Bishop) Francis J. Christian:
1. They continue to refuse to accept the understanding of the formula, 'No Salvation
Outside The Church.'
2. They are canonically irregular in regard to the church because they are present in the
diocese without permission of the bishop and are running ministries without the permission
of the bishop and because they have no legitimate authority who has oversight over them
and to whom they are responsible."
Thus it is that, groups like the New Hampshire St Benedict Center and the OSJ, and
individuals of like mind, like John and David Brindle, CLAIM to be Catholic, claim
to be in union with the "popes" or "eternal Rome" (or other such
formula) but attack and disparage the the post conciliar popes - including the CURRENT
ruling pope - and the liturgy of the Church. They claim to be "traditional"
Catholics!
- Exerpts from e-mail responses from Mike Malone to John Loughnan:
29 Jan 2000: "When John (a good friend, who hosts almost all my written works on his
website) unsubscribed, he told me that it was only temporary."
30 Jan 2000: "John's been a member of my List for at least two years."
I then provided to Mike Malone instances of John Brindle's style of denial and evasion:
FJL) "To complete the Feeneyite link, TradCath has in his Book Section no less than 5
contributions from Mike Malone, Moderator of the Feeneyite Sacred-Heart list."
Brindle)"Yet again you are lying and attempting to slander my name, John. And yet
again I invite everyone on this message board and to see for themselves precisely how many
times Mike Malone visited my site, and signed my guestbook. Mike Malone signed my
guestbook once, as did his son 'Marty Malone' (who also signed my guestbook once). John...
I'm starting to think that you have a reading comprehension problem or something."
FJL)"AND, he has two contributions from Fr. James Wathen, OSJ."
Brindle)"If you are referring to my guestbook, then I most certainly do not. I have
two signatures from a "Rev. Fr. Kenneth P. Vinsel," who is the situated in
Denver Colorado. But I most certainly have never had a signature on my guestbook from
Father Wathen."
FJL)"He also has a complete page dedicated to Fr. Wathen's OSJ."
Brindle)"'Fr. Wathen's OSJ'? If you had enough brains to actually look into the
matter, then you'd see that Father Wathen does not run the Order of St. John. In fact, the
Order is run by someone else entirely. Try doing a little research next time John."
There we see the classic attempt to not reply to the actual point. I refer to files
contained in his Book Section - he attempts to suggest that I am referring to his Guest
Book. The facts are that the files did and do exist on his web-site!
And in another place on the TRADCATH list, he replies to John Clay:
Brindle)"+++ You're trying real hard John, but language is language. And furthermore,
I object to your unfair classing of myself as a 'Feeneyite.' I am neither a member of
Father Feeney's Order, nor do I take my doctrines from him. Therefore, I think that an
apology is in order. A more proper term would be Catholic, or, if you want to get down to
brass tacks, you could call me a Traditional Catholic, or even a follower of St. Pius X,
who said 'We must understand doctrine in the sense that it was written.'"
Now, THAT is a classic "BRINDLE" defense; to state that he is not a
"MEMBER." That may be technically true, but it avoids what may be the REAL truth
- that he adheres to the philosophy of the organization which is in opposition to the
Organization and Authority of the local priest and bishop and, therefore, is NOT in
communion with the ruling Pope and the See of Rome. One may be a supporter of a football
team without being a MEMBER. It is the old salesman's tactic - give a "good"
reason, but not the "real" reason.
Incidently, the web-page which contained "no less than 5 contributions from Mike
Malone" is "Ecclesia
Militans: Catholics" at URL http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/6480/catholics.html
And, the "complete page dedicated to Fr. Wathen's OSJ" - or to the OSJ to which
Fr. Wathen belongs - is titled "Sovereign Order
of St John of Jerusalem", and is located at URL http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/6480/masslocations.html
- Copy available.
- e-mail Wed. 26 Jan 2000 07:18:21 EST
- In Hoc Signo Vinces http://www.ihsv.com/aboutus.html
- Traditio URL http://www.traditio.com
- Terry Boyle
URL http://www.tboyle.net/Catholicism/Cath_Links_Priest_Groups.html
e-mail to TRADCATH list: Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999
- e-mail Edmond Micucci to Stephen Hand July 27, 2000.
- From memory, I believe that the "abjuration" was made to a schismatic
Thuc-line bishop - so it isn't worth a cracker!!!
- IHSV URL http://www.ihsv.com/mass.html (now
a dead link.)
- Posted to TRADCATH list 29 Sep 1999.
- Articles: "Bro. Bugnolo's
Comments on Fr. Wathen's Reply (in blue text)
URL http://www.franciscan-archive.org/index2.html
- IHSV - Dogma
- Thank's for the English lesson, David. That will be of interest to the Oxford Dictionary
people who claim that either pronounciation is acceptable. (cf. The Concise Oxford
Dictionary, © Oxford University Press, 1964, 1976)
- IHSV - Catholic Articles (now a dead
link.)
- Sherry L. Brindle promoter of Our Lady's Heavenly
Treasures
Another coincidence that David Brindle and John Brindle also promote that site?
- The Little Pebble - Pope Peter
Romanus [in waiting]
- Variously known as: Charles Hammer, Charles The Hammer, Hammer, TCA.
Charles Hammer and Traditional Catholic
Apologetics
URL http://www.tradcatholic.centralky.com
e-mail addresses tradcat@centralky.com and h_the@hotmail.com
Real name: Charles Goldstein. His bio on CARM list states his name, nick-name, age 31,
married, education 4th year of college.
ISP provider while on the Fidei Catholicae list: 209.215.181.X (varies 81, 103, etc).
In addition to all the St Benedict Center/OSJ-Wathenite material, there is more:
for example, several files from David Goldstein, LL.D., who "Hammer" describes
as "a ex-Jew"!
As a matter of coincidence(?) I happen to possess a copy of Benjamin H. Freedman's letter
to David Goldstein, LL.D, entitled "Facts Are Facts - The Truth About Khazars",
dated October 10, 1954. It would too coincidental, I think, to believe that the two Davids
are the same person. It might be in the ballpark to conjecture on a relationship between
David Goldstein and Charles Goldstein? Mr Freedman lamented that
- "My solitary attempts to date 'to give light to them that sit in darkness, and in
the shadow' may prove no more successful with you now than they have in so many other
instances where I have failed during the past thirty years. In your case I feel rather
optomistic at the moment."
If there is a relationship - how sad must Benjamin Freedman and David Goldstein feel today
at the schismatic displays?
- Matts Catholic Apologetics
- Jim Vogel, then webmaster of the pro-SSPX list.
- Steve Ray's Catholic Convert Message Board
URL http://www.catholic-convert.com
- From the "Our Lady Of The Rosary" Frequently
Asked Questions page:
"...In response to this dilemma, a group of concerned Catholic priests...came
together...to establish a program for the welfare of the children and the Church...They
established Our Lady of the Rosary School in 1993...governed by a board of
directors..." Is it not in the interests of an enquirer who are the priests behind an
educational establishment which operates outside the diocesan system?
- e-mail message to me on Jan. 17, 2000.
,
- Holywar.org or Holywar Start at Index 1 and work
through to Index 10!!!!
F. John Loughnan
Dec. 24, 2000
Ecclesia Militans Webpage
In Hoc Signo Vinces Webpage.