Unscientific Science
By Richard Salbato
In the courts of America
debates are taking place between Intelligent Design and Evolution. The ID people say if you just look at a baby
or a spider, you can see they had to be created by an intelligent source. The
Evolutionists say this just happened by evolutionary processes and that it did
not take any "source" to make it happen. I am a Catholic and as such I know that there cannot be any
conflict between true science and religion.
In fact, the modern scientific revolution of the last 400 years, came
about because of Catholic people.
The separation of Science
and Religion can be blamed on both sides.
Some Christians (I use that term because many were Protestants)
interpret scripture in such a narrow path that it leaves no true understanding
of how God works. Some insist that God
created the world in six days as we know time today. But this narrow interpretation is no different than the Darwinian
people who base their theories on the provably false notion of
Uniformitarianism.
On the other hand, what
prompted me to write this article is a recent statement by the director of the
Vatican Observatory, George Coyne, S.J., that I consider heresy. He said, "... if we take the results of
modern science seriously, it is difficult to believe that God is omnipotent and
omniscient in the sense of many of the scholastic philosophers." Now, that makes me very angry because that
is pure heresy and he needs to be removed or retract that statement.
The Church does not error and when it teaches that God is omnipotent and
omniscient, and that He is the author of the Bible. I believe each and every word of
the bible (unlike England's Catholic Bishops) but these words need
understanding. The Bible does not
error, but the reader does. Otherwise,
there would not be 30,000 different Christian religions all based on the same
Bible.
The readers understanding is
not always correct and in some cases there is mystery that is not yet
known. Let us take First Genesis for
example. On the first day, God created
Heaven and Earth, water, light and darkness.
But was this one day as we know it today, 24 hours? He did not create the moon until the 4th
day and this was even after He created land and plants.
In fact, if you go to
Genesis 2:4 you will read that these 6 days are called the "generations of
the heaven and earth". Considering
that this "generation" has lasted 2005 years, those generations are
not one day at all but just 6 different periods of time and could be millions
of years or at least given the appearance of millions of years since God can
create anything with the appearance of age.
Before going on I want to say that right now I believe that God did
create in 6 days, but that time was not uniform and is not now, as I will show
below. I also believe that God created with the appearance of age. If time is a constant, then I am wrong. We will show that a constant time has not
yet been proven. On the otherhand I can prove that God creates with the
appearance of age.
Since God is the author of
science I am inclined to think he did everything in logically, as well as
scientifically. And as an apologetic Catholic, it is my job to show how God and
His Church are correct. On the other
hand, true science could not be wrong, so both must be complimentary of each
other. This I believe and hope to
prove. Remember however, that I said,
"true science".
Two Good
Free Thinking Scientists
I had a lot of fights with
professors in college over "science" because it just did not make
logical sense. But some years later I
read some books by a Medical Doctor ( not an earth scientist ) that did make
some logical sense. He was Emanuel
Velikovsky and wrote a book called WORLDS IN COLLISION and another called
WORLDS IN UPHEAVAL. His writings were a
little far out but amazing and logical.
He wrote a scientific theory called "Catastrophic Evolution.
He said that the moon was very young and that Venus
and Mars have changed orbits in the very recent history. He predicted that if we ever went to the
moon, we would find that the relationship of potassium to argon in the rocks
would show that the moon is very young. He said that the craters on the moon
were not made from meteorites but from a molten hot planet that cooled leaving
bubbling action remnants like you will find if you boil lead and then let it
cool. Round circles will appear that look like craters.
He said that Venus was a hot planet, not a cold one as
the scientific world believed. He said
that the cloud cover over Venus were a result of its heat. He made many
predictions of what we would find if we ever sent rockets or men into outer
space. No one believed him. He died before any space shots were ever
made.
Velikovsky was the only scientist in the world who
properly predicted everything that we would discover when we went into outer
space. He and he alone, had the right scientific predictions, but even today,
he is forgotten.
The other great scientific thinker I have found is Marshall Smith, Editor of BroJon Gazette at www.brojon.com
and I find his logical thinking a great pleasure to read. I do not agree with everything he says but
his logic and knowledge are refreshing, even if he seems to have no firm
religious beliefs. But then, neither
did Velikovshy. I think he takes over
where Velikovshy left off and does it in a very logical way, which science has
to be. Illogical science is not
science.
How Did God
Create?
God can not only transcend the laws of physics and probability, but God can also transcend logic
(for example, God could create a square circle, or could make one equal two), because God is not
bound by any limitations. God can
intervene in the world by superseding the laws of physics and probability (i.
e., God can create miracles), but it is impossible (and in fact meaningless) to
suggest that God can rewrite the laws of logic. God originally could intervene
in the world by superseding the laws of physics (miracles), and did do so when
creating the universe, but then he self-obligated
himself not to do so anymore in order to give humankind free will. Miracles are rare, at best, and
always hidden, to prevent humans from being overwhelmed by absolute knowledge
of God's existence, which could remove free will.
God is able to do everything that is in accord with his
own nature. He has no external power exerted on him, and is the source and origin
of all power. The nature of God includes logic, and thus God cannot do anything
which is logically absurd. God is able to alter the laws of physics since they
are not part of his nature (strictly speaking, though they may be reflective of
it), they are only a means to an end. Tertullian summarized this view as follows:
"In one sense there will
be something difficult even for God — namely, that which He has not done — not
because He could not [in terms of raw power], but because He would not [in
terms of self-consistency] do it. For with God, to be willing is to be able,
and to be unwilling is to be unable; all that He has willed, however, He has
both been able to accomplish, and has displayed His ability."
Omnipotent, can do anything, omniscient, knows everything, and omni-benevolent, wants only good.
That being said and the overwhelming evidence that God can and does go
beyond the limits of physics (miracles) even today for everyone to see, we
still must look at science to see how God chose to create. I think using time (one day or millions of
years) is irrelevant since God lives outside of time, created time, and can
create in an instant what physics would call age (i.e. instant cures of cancer
and the instant growth of new tissue).
Nevertheless, it would be interesting to see just how God created
because we have scientific evidence that shows His handiwork.
What I hope to do here is show that the evidence does not show Darwinian
Evolution (although God could have done it that way). And since God cannot be illogical and Darwinian Evolution is
illogical, God would not choose this method.
It seems obvious to me that God chose the atom method and the conversion
of pure energy to physical things. We see this in the smallest and largest
things in the universe. Hebrews 11:3 By faith we
understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things
which are seen were not made of things which are visible. And this we see in E=MC2 and
its reverse.
But let us confine ourselves to our universe for simplicity. Let there be light and God created the Sun
(although this may not have been our sun but the original sun - the center of
the universe), and this was hot and rotating like all atoms. The Bible does not yet call it
"Sun" because it also contained in it all the other planets. As its rotation increased the lighter
elements came to the surface and the heavier to the center. These lighter objects collected at the
center (equator) and built up until they were thrown off into space creating
the other planets in our system, including the earth. All these remained on the equator plain of the Sun and all
rotated in the same direction (at least those that came from the Sun). Obviously the earth at first was the same as
the Sun, just molten hot elements. It
also was spinning and creating its own gravity or electoral magnetic forces. Because the heavier elements go to the
center and the lighter go outward according to their weight the result is
layers of mater, both solid and liquid.
When the earth first formed
it had a very thick atmosphere, more than four times thicker than at present.
It was made mostly of carbon dioxide, methane and ammonia, just like all the other
planets in our solar system. The thick dense atmosphere covered the massive
thick layer of liquid ocean about eight miles deep, and there was no land.
As the planet cooled it
shrank and hot gases deep in the mantle were released into the ancient atmosphere.
As the planet earth cooled and shrank, its diameter became slightly smaller. As
the earth's diameter shrank with age it also rotated faster and faster.
The first life form on earth
was simple single-celled plants called blue-green algae or phytoplankton. These
"plants" as do all plants, take carbon dioxide, methane and ammonia,
and converts them into hydrocarbons, carbohydrates and ammonia (or amino) acids
which make up proteins and which become the parts of the body of the plant. And
then as a waste product the plants release oxygen and nitrogen.
To do all of this, all that
the plants needed was sunlight. With no predators or other life forms to
compete with, the plants completely filled the oceans with sun-loving
phytoplankton. And the "plantification"
of earth completely converted earth's entire atmosphere from carbon dioxide
into oxygen and nitrogen.
After the first plants had
converted most of the primeval atmosphere into oxygen and nitrogen, the first
single-celled animals appeared. Animals were a very different form of life.
They can't survive on just air and sunlight, as do the plants. The animal were
not "breath-airians." The animals needed something to eat to get
their energy. They ate the plants.
Thus ended the great age of
atmosphere conversion, and began the earth's present balance between two
competing and complementary lifeforms, plants and animals. It leaves the earth
now with its oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere. That's
why no other planets in the solar system have an oxygen atmosphere, since it's a by-product of single-celled plant life and requires a very
deep watery ocean. How long did this
take for God to do it? We well look at
time below.
At the beginning, the earth
was in orbit around the sun and was spinning on its axis and layered, each
layer lighter and less dense going outward from the center. As the earth cooled, a firm surface crust
was formed on the outside and the earth and
it began to shrink. This is like
heating raw iron ore in a vessel, the impurities are lighter and float on the
surface and solidifies into a crust on the surface.
Any hot metal will shrink
when cooled. The core of the earth is hot metal. Also over time, gases in the
interior of the earth will leak out into the atmosphere. As the earth shrank,
it spun around faster and faster. As the earth spins faster, the centrifugal
force along the equator increases and the equator becomes fatter as the top
crust moved towards the equator.
The sun, and the outer
planets, Jupiter and Saturn, are measurably oblate, since they rotate fast
enough for the centrifugal force to make them fat around the middle. The hard core of the earth does not become
oblate because it is hard but the crust is soft and becomes fatter. The rocky
lithosphere of earth slid toward the equator on the hot fluid layer of molten
asthenosphere. This caused the rocky lithosphere to be squeezed together and
build up into a thick ring along the equator. The rocky lithosphere of earth,
floating on the fluid asthenosphere, became thicker around the middle and the
earth appeared to became oblate. But it was really only the material along the
earth's surface around the equator that changed shape. The earth's highly
compressed solid core and lower mantle did not change shape.
This slow squeezing and
building up of the earth's surface lithosphere toward the equator causes a
unique form of mountain to be created. These mountains are called
"geosynclines" and look something like the skin of a dried prune. The
centrifugal force squeezing the geosyncline mountains, created a narrow strip
of mountain ranges all the way around the equator raised up almost to a height
of about eight miles. It was at that point in time, the rocky lithosphere
material first peeked above the waves of the ancient eight mile deep ocean.
It was just after the
Devonian, and in the Carboniferous age that the life in the oceans suddenly
burst forth upon the land in wild abundance. The land suddenly appeared during
the Devonian, caused by the conservation of angular momentum (CAM) and the
earth spinning faster and faster as it cooled.
The massive growth of the
rain forest-like ancient gymnosperm plants such as fern trees, redwoods and
pines, so covered the newly exposed land that they died and left thick layers
of dead trees and plants now called coal layers along the geosyncline
mountains.
Those ages mark the position
and gradual uplifting and expansion of the narrow strip of geosyncline
mountains above the eight mile deep ocean which still covered the whole rest of
the planet. Any place around the world
where you now find the narrow strips of wrinkled sinuous geosyncline mountains
and large coal deposits mark the location around the world which was the
original tropical rain forest along the equator of the earth during the late
Paleozoic and Mesozoic periods.
All these
coal deposits were originally on the equator.
For them to be where they are now requires a 45 degree shift of the
poles, or a 45% shift in the land masses.
(see below)
From the first appearance of
land to the end of the Cretaceous age, the lithospheric rocky continental
material continued to slide toward the equator and rise higher and higher. The
earth cooled and spun faster and faster until
a big chunk of the thick clay layer around the equator suddenly broke free and
flew off into space. This released a huge amount of angular momentum and the earth suddenly
slowed down and become stable again.
This faster and faster spin
of the earth gave a large portion of that thick belt of land around the equator
less than zero gravity. The only thing holding it to the earth was the
mechanical adhesion of the thick fluid lava layer called the asthenosphere.
Then it simply overcame that sticky adhesion and it floated off into space.
God's Creation
of the Moon
Three fourths of the thick
rocky ring around the earth carried with it a large amount of the rapidly
spinning earth's energy in the form of angular momentum. It spiraled outward
and was so large that it formed into a sphere by its own gravity and became
what is today called the moon.
Note that when three fourths
of the rocky lithosphere, went off into space, so did three fourths of the
plants and animals on that land, three fourths of the oceans with the fish in
them, along with three fourths of the earth's atmosphere.
But the moon is too small to
have enough gravity to hold on to the oceans and atmosphere. Those simply
evaporated into the vacuum of space. The moon then became dry and lifeless. But
that does account for the existence of mysterious riverbeds, deltas and rills
still seen on the dry moon. For a short time the moon was completely covered by
water. Even today, the general appearance of the moon close-up is that of rock
strewn ocean bottom.
Since the 1912 publication of
German geologist Alfred Wegener's book, it has been recognized that three
fourths of the rocky continental SIAL material of earth is simply missing. These calculations, of the balance of
materials on earth, have mystified science for a long time. However, that is exactly the size of the
moon.
When the earth spins at 24
hours per day, as it does today, then the force of gravity at the equator is
about the same as the force of gravity at the north and south poles. But if the earth spins faster, in about a 12
hour revolution day, then the force of gravity at the equator is around half of
what it would be at the poles. If the earth spins around in about 7 hours, then
the force of gravity becomes rather close to zero at the equator, while the
force at the poles remains the same.
There are several planets
and moons in the solar system which rotate about that fast. It merely indicates
how long the body in space has been cooling and shrinking. Rapid spinning is a
normal part of planet and moon evolution, and is caused by the body shrinking
with age and the principle of Conservation of Angular Momentum (CAM).
With another quick
calculation we can find the volume of the missing three quarters of the rocky
continents of earth. Simply take three fourths of the surface area of the earth
and multiply that by 37 miles, or the average depth to the hot molten fluid
asthenosphere where the separation took place. That volume of the three fourths
of the surface material missing from the earth's rocky layer is exactly equal
to the volume of the moon. And that calculation also shows the two volumes are
exactly the same with an accuracy of about one percent. Amazing.
If you calculate the
spinning energy of the earth, actually it's total angular momentum then the
principle of the Conservation of Angular Momentum (CAM) says that even if a
portion of the earth separates and flies off into space, all of the angular
momentum will "always" be conserved.
If you calculate the total
angular momentum, of today's earth and the moon and add them together, you will
find that the sum is exactly equal to the original angular momentum of a rapid
spinning oblate earth rotating with a speed of about 7 hours per revolution.
This is important, since it shows that no other body, such as a nearby roaming
asteroid impact could have been involved in the process.
For most of the Cretaceous
Age, the animals and plants living on the strip of land around the equator were
in an almost zero gravity environment. It was almost like floating in space or walking
on the moon. What happened after the
event was that the force of gravity near the equator, where the animals lived,
went from near zero to suddenly increase to about its present force, and the
length of the day changed from 7 hours to 24 hours. We will consider below what will happen to a 30,000 lb. Dinosaur
that goes from zero gravity to the gravity of today later.
A little further calculation
can show that almost all of the moons in our solar system were ejected from
their parent planet by this very same process. It is a natural part of the
aging and evolution of planetary systems. As a rotating planet cools, it spins
faster and faster, becoming oblate and unstable. It releases a moon from the
oblate surface decreasing the planet's rotation rate and it becomes stable
again. This may be repeated with the larger planets. After a long time, the
larger planets continue to cool and shrink and release another moon. The larger
the planet the more moons it produces to become stable.
A mathematical proof
involves the observation of the Inverse Bode's Law. The Inverse Law shows that
the spacing of each of the planets from outward to inward is about 62 percent
of the distance of the next outer planet. The Inverse Bode's Law also holds
true for the major moons of the solar system, including the formation of a
broken ring or asteroid system after the third or fourth planet or moon inward.
The moons also show the same
pattern of three or four large regularly spaced moons, a ring system and then several
smaller regularly space moons which follow the "law" inside the ring
system. Many other smaller atypical moons give away the fact that they are
randomly "captured" intruders, and don't follow the "law",
since they are very tiny and usually rotate out of the plane of the ecliptic
and may even rotate backwards.
That amount of regularity,
symmetry and following the same "law" in both the planets of the
solar system and the moon systems around the planets, cannot be accounted for
by the random formation of planets and moons out of a primordial nebula of dust
around a star. But using the principle of Conservation of Angular Momentum
(CAM), and the observation that the planets and moons are using Tara rotation
routines to transfer angular momentum from one body to another can account for
the regular spacing, spin rates and relative sizes of the planets and moons. If
that is accurate for the other planets and moons, then surely it would also
account for the formation of earth's moon.
The End of
the Dinosaurs
There is something called
the K-T boundary all over the earth.
This is a three foot layer of white powder containing iridium. Below this powder are found the fossils of
large dinosaurs, and above the boundary no dinosaurs are found. The two most
accepted theories are a 6
mile diameter meteorite or an extremely large volcano. Whatever happened at the K-T boundary, killed only the large reptilians, the
dinosaurs, but had no affect on such smaller ancient reptiles as turtles,
crocodiles, alligators and reptilian-like birds and insects.
Let us look at why the large
dinosaurs could not take the change but the smaller reptiles could. Reptiles must use external means to regulate
their temperature. Mammals have a
thyroid gland to control evaporative cooling to maintain a constant blood-brain
temperature. Brain tissue must be kept
at about 100F to remain electrically and chemically active. Most mammals,
marsupials and birds, can tolerate weather changes, but reptiles wouldn't have
a chance.
Also prior to the K-T shift
nearly all of the plants were gymnosperms - evergreen naked-seed. After the K-T boundary a new plant -
angiosperms, or flowering, or hard coverings seeds, which can tolerate hot and
cold appeared for the first time. These
new plants cannot tolerate a constant temperature but must have seasons (winter
and summer) to survive.
What causes temperature
changes? And in fact what causes
rain? First of all without the ice on
the north and south poles there would be no temperature changes at all. Also without the tilt of the earth at 23.5
degrees, there would be no seasons. So
(it can be assumed) prior to K-T there was no ice on the north and south poles
and no 23.5 degree tilt of the earth.
That being the case, the earth was tropical at all land masses, which
was consecrated at the equator.
Without the seasonal changes
angiosperms would fail. And in fact, the geologic record shows no angiosperms
or thyroid mammals before K-T
Change in
Atmosphere
If we believe, like
Evolutionists, what we see today is what we would see millions of years ago.
then we would have to believe that the atmosphere was the same then as it is
now. They call this
uniformitarianism. There is no evidence
even today that this is true. The
oxygen today is less than it was just 100 years ago. The ozone changes from year to year. It is known that Ozone protects us from the harmful radiation of
the sun, and without it, all life would end.
However, if the Ozone was much higher in consecration than it is now,
even carbon 12 and 14 could not be found on earth. It is this carbon 12 and 14 that accounts for things aging, and
in fact dying.
During the P-T (Permian
Triassic) nearly 95% of all life in both the oceans and the land simply
disappeared. For this to happen, other
things had to simply disappear also, like a great part of the land, the water
and the atmosphere. If when the 65% of
the land left the earth to create the Moon, then a large part of the oceans and
the atmosphere left also.
The watery oceans are called
the hydrosphere and above them we have the even lighter less dense gaseous
layer of air called the atmosphere, each layer going outward lighter and less
dense than the deeper layers below. If originally, there were four times as much
land, ocean and atmosphere, then the depth of the proto-oceans would be four
times as deep as it is now.
Zero
Gravity
Before the K-T event, with
almost zero gravity force, the huge 60 ton dinosaurs could walk around as easily
as a chicken crossing the road. With little gravity, the gigantic 6 foot dragon
flies could "swim" through the very dense atmosphere as easily as a
house fly buzzing past your nose. After the K-T separation event, and the
increase in gravity from near zero to the present day force, all of the huge
mega-fauna, such as dinosaurs, simply were crushed by their own weight.
Only the small animals, both
reptiles and mammals, survived. And that is what is seen in the geologic
record.
For scientists wanting real
numbers, you would need to use two dimensionless scientific numbers called the
Reynold's Number and the Froud Number. The Reynold's Number relates viscosity
force (air resistance) to gravity force. The Froud Number relates momentum or
inertia to gravity force. These are often called the rules of scaling.
Prior to the K-T event huge
6 foot dragonflies were flying, but today even the largest are much smaller
than a 6 inches in size. The Reynold's Number ratio is 10 to one. Prior to the
K-T event, 60 ton dinosaurs walked around, while today the biggest walking
animals are only about 6 ton elephants. The Froud Number ratio is 10 to one. A
quick use of the Reynold's and Froud Numbers would show that prior to the K-T
event the net force of gravity along the equator was only about 1/10th of what
it is today on earth.
From that ratio of ten to
one, you can easily calculate the earth's rotation rate of about 7 hours to
produce a net gravity of only about 1/10g. That's almost half of the present day gravity on the moon. As a human being with that
small gravity force on earth, you could easily lift cars with one hand, leap
tall buildings and wear a big red S on your shirt. The earth was a very
different place just prior to the K-T boundary event.
We will find that along with
three fourths of the missing continents, the moon also has three fourths of the
now missing supply of oil, gas, gold, diamonds and all the other valuable
"mineral wealth" of the earth. The moon is a vast treasure trove just
waiting to be mined. And with riches far greater than on earth.
All of those precious
materials are all neatly compacted on the far side of the moon.
The near side of the moon,
the part we always see, is simply the bottom part of the missing continents or
the old heavy iron rich lava asthenosphere. That's why the thin front side is
covered with black lava parts called maria.
The lava (heavy side of the moon) always points toward us. That's
because the heavy side of the moon always points "downward" toward
the center of the earth. There are no
black maria, or seas of lava, on the far side of the moon. The back side of the
moon is made of much lighter rocky continental material. This was the very
thick belt of land around the oblate earth just before it separated and formed
the moon. Are there dinosaur fossils on the far side of the moon? I think so, and maybe even humans.
Missing
Link is Magnetic Field
Evolution by "natural
selection" was not the process which created the myriad life-forms that
now exist on earth. There is plenty of evidence which can prove that. The one
item of critical evidence, to prove that Darwin's Evolution is not correct, is
that after 150 years of diligent searching, not one, no, not even one example
of a missing link, or any intermediate species form has ever been discovered.
But that is exactly what is needed to show Darwin's evolution theory is
correct. Since no intermediate species have ever been found, therefore Darwin's
gradual evolution theory by "natural selection" is shown to be false.
Every so often, the magnetic
field of the earth reverses the north and south magnetic poles. The earth
itself does not reverse - just the magnetic field. During the reversal process,
the earth's magnetic field, which usually acts as a shield protecting
life-forms from intense solar X-rays, gamma rays, and deadly dangerous ionizing
particle radiation, suddenly disappears. The deadly intense solar radiation is
momentarily allowed to strike the surface of the earth.
Within hours, about 99
percent of all life on earth is instantly killed by the intense radiation.
Those few, 1 percent of survivors, hidden in caves, in holes in the earth, or
under water are highly deformed, damaged and mutated by the intense radiation
causing direct damage to the DNA molecules in their reproductive cells. But the
radiation damage is not visible in those survivors, but it is clearly seen in
their direct offspring.
Within months, or a year, or
less than one generation, the surviving mutants which may or may not still be viable,
may be able to reproduce. This results in multitudes of numerous, similar but
highly modified, mutant life-forms. Then and only then, does Darwin's evolution
process of "natural selection," enter the scene, to cause the less
able or disabled mutant forms to be lost to history, while the strong survivors
with many new adaptable traits become numerous new species. The new species
were suddenly "created" by the intense radiation within one
generation.
Example: during the last magnetic
field reversal, one species, Saber Tooth tigers, were extremely irradiated and
in less than a year became, modern lions, tigers, pumas, ocelots, bobcats,
pussycats and numerous other feline species. None of the new species was ever
seen before the massive radiation event at the magnetic field reversal. Darwin's "evolution" didn't and
couldn't do all of that within several years. But that is what the geologic
record shows -- almost instantaneous "creation" of many new species
by intense random radiation with no intermediate "missing link"
forms, and all within one generation.
Since the time of the age of
dinosaurs, there have been about 15 to 20 magnetic field reversals. At each
reversal, there is almost instantaneous creation of multitudes of new
life-forms, usually resulting in many forms coming from just one earlier life
form. And usually the earlier life form disappears, since it is no longer
competitive.
Another example: The early
horse, eohippus, about the size of a dog, disappeared, but became donkeys,
horses and several equine variants, such as zebras, which are almost related
species. Notice, in this process there is no gradual evolution -- and thus no
"missing links" between species.
No missing links between
species have ever been discovered. The new species were "created"
almost in the blink of an eye, by intense solar radiation. No intermediate
species or "missing link" were ever born. The new mutant species were
born directly from their highly radiated and DNA-modified parents. Thus, almost instantaneously, in geologic
time, the new life-forms are "created" by the intense radiation, and
then the survivors quickly "evolved" in just one generation into the
many viable new species.
Time -
Millions of Years or Thousands
Consider the time it takes
for something to travel a given distance is Time = Distance / Speed. When this is applied to light from distant
stars, the time calculates out to be millions of years. If the speed of light (c) has not changed
(no proof), then we must ask if time is constant. Einstein's relativity theory says it is not.
Einstein believed that
gravity distorts time. This effect has
been measured experimentally. Clocks at
the top of tall buildings, where gravity is slightly less, run faster than
those at the bottom. If the theory is
correct. then if gravity is strong enough time would stand still, and where gravity is weak enough,
time would run faster.
Question? Is there time in the very center of the
earth? Is there time in the center of
the universe?
Assume also that matter in
space is not infinite, that the stars end at some point (which most scientists
would not believe), and that after that point there is nothing. Scientists make the arbitrary assumption (without
any scientific evidence or necessity) that the universe has no boundaries, no
edge and no center.
If the universe has
boundaries, then there is a net gravitational effect toward the center. Time at the edge would be faster than time
at the center. We would then have a white
hole instead of a black hole. This
would account for light years being calculated at millions of years and be
wrong.
Ice on
North and South Poles
We are still facing three
problems: the 45% shift of the continents from the equator to where they are
now, rain and wind which could not have existed at the time of equator land
mass, and the ice on the north and south poles.
All of these problems, or
questions, are linked together since without the ice on the North and South
poles there could be no winds, since wind is caused by temperature
changes. Without winds and these
temperature changes to pick up water and create clouds, we would have no
rain. Without rain we would have no
rivers.
Scientists
have postulated that a canopy existed prior to the ice that would result in a
subtropical world without the hostile elements of nature, sort of a greenhouse
effect. According to this framework,
the canopy filtered out the radiation that now penetrates to the earth from outer
space. This canopy was in three layers:
an outer ozone layer much thicker than it is today, a central water vapor
layer, trapping long wave earth rays, and an inner atmosphere with a higher
concentration of carbon dioxide and water vapor. This inner atmosphere covered
the earth like a warm blanket, and watered the earth with dew.
The
fossil record indicates subtropical plants all over the world. Tropical
forests, complete with fruit trees, have been uncovered in the frozen tundra of
New Siberian Islands north of Russia. The freezing process occurred so
quickly that there are still green leaves and fruit on some of the trees.
Palm
trees have been found in the ice north of Norway. At the South Pole,
archeological digs have discovered forests with tree trunks up to three feet in
diameter. This is what you would expect if the earth was covered by a canopy.
And where there are plants, you'd expect to find animals.
Interestingly
enough, thousands of animals have been unearthed in ice-covered parts of the
world. In both Siberia and Alaska the remains of gigantic camels, lions,
horses, mammoths, tigers and bison have been found frozen in ice and mud. By
the way, many of those creatures died so quickly that their mouths were still
full of food. Others had undigested plants and flowers in their stomachs.
The
radiation filtering process of this vapor canopy would have radically altered
the aging and dying process. Everything would have lived longer, and a lot of
things would have been larger than we know them.
The
evidence from the fossil record indicates that plants and animals at one time
grew to gigantic proportions. For example, a reptile keeps growing until it
dies, and if a reptile lives for hundreds of years ... what do you get?
Monstrous reptiles - dinosaurs.
The
record indicates that moss-like plants grew to be three feet tall, and
asparagus stalks grew to be 40 feet tall. Pigs were once as big as cows, some
birds were eleven feet long, and cockroaches were a foot long.
Studies
of the quick-frozen animals in the Arctic suggest that they were peacefully
grazing on summer buttercups when a sudden freeze of temperatures in excess of
-150 degrees overcame them in a space of a half hour.
Every
continent is covered with thick layers of strata, which shows that flooding
took place on a massive, global scale. By the way, strata are not being formed
today, except on a very small scale at the mouth of rivers.
Marine
fossils are found all over the world - even in the Himalayas - 20,000 feet
tall. Hundreds of sharks are buried in Ohio - not exactly beachfront property.
As shown earlier, we can
account for the creation earth from the sun, of the land mass, fish, birds and
animals, and of the moon. The
splitting off of the land mass, needed to create the moon, would have taken
with it a great part of our atmosphere because it too was spinning at a fast
rate and much of it went into orbit around the moon or dispersed into
space. This, in itself, could have
reduced the canopy protecting the earth from radiation, but it could not have
tilted the earth or at least the outer layer of land mass 45% to the way they
are today.
Considering that this Ice
had to come quickly (IN AN INSTANT) and from the sky in order to catch animals
with tropical vegetation still in their mouths, we must see how this could have
happened and where the ice came from.
Even today the earth is being hit with ice meteorites the size of large
houses but these melt in the atmosphere and never reach land. These are made of mostly hydrogen, helium
and other gases. But once in our
atmosphere, they pick up Ozone and Oxygen and create true water vapor.
Not long ago a military
experiment was made to see if a small atom bomb could take out a complete fleet
of ships. It did not. However, the explosion took tons of water
into the shy and when it came down, it came down as chunks of ice as big as
houses and bigger. This did sink the
fleet of ships.
One explanation for the ice
on the North and South poles is a large Hydrogen, Helium meteorite. Such a meteorite (comet or asteroid) has
been found in Mexico, suggesting a size that could have demolished the
earth. This could have been a result of
the creation of the moon. Considering
that a large part of our water, our atmosphere and our Ozone spun off with the
material that created the moon, this could have spun around the moon and came
back to earth as one large mass of frozen atmosphere. Or it could have broken off another spinning planet like Jupiter.
Whatever the source of this
large item, its impact on our magnetic field, our atmosphere, and then our
earth would cause a chain reaction something like dominos. First, the crushing of our atmosphere would
have pushed against the earth at some angle, shaking everything like hitting a
cup of water. Inside the crust of the
earth is molten lava, which weighs 1500 times more than water, and it, in turn,
would move back and forth from East to West crushing open the outside
mantle. At the same time (if the angle
was just right) the earth would have flipped over very fast, so fast in fact,
that the water would not be able to keep up with it. The continent would split into peaces, the continent that was
once only on the equator.
A large part of this comet
would dissolve in the upper atmosphere combine with the atmosphere and start
raining ice and water all over the world.
At the north and south poles it would rain ice and at the equator it
would rain water.
With the fast spinning of
the earth, the entire Pacific Ocean would cross the entire American continent
in a huge tidal wave, as much as a mile high and the Atlantic Ocean would do
the same until coming to a gradual drain back into the seas.
When peace came back to the
earth, it was at an angle different from before at 23.5% off the true North and
South Poles and the land at 45% to the equator. After this impact, we have some new effects on earth that were never there before: wind, clouds,
rain, seasons, snow, and rainbows. We
also have a balanced earth rotation that exactly allows the gravitation to be
equal all over the world. We have a sun
and moon that have the exact relation of size to distance that make them appear
the same size. We have a moon that is
so far out there (compared to other planet's moons) that it causes mild tides,
and helps the earth maintain a consistent 24 hour rotation.
God Using
the Logic of Science
God created the heaven and
earth, water, light and darkness. God
divided the waters above from the waters below. He placed the sun and the moon in the skies. He brought forth the fish and the birds of
the air. And last, He brought forth
land animals and man. He then destroyed
what He had made with water and started all over again. This I believe and nothing more. However, God could have done all this in a
single day or single second. The Bible says He chose to do it in six different
times periods, leading me to believe He chose to do so in a logical scientific
way. The possible scientific method
shown above fits both the scientific evidence and the words of the Bible. We living humans know very little, during
ouyr life time, but I hope I have shown one possible way God created. If nothing else, I have shown that true
science does not contradict God, and that a lot of what we call science today
is pure garbage.
One web site that does a
good job in making science cooperate with the Bible is:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/AnswersBook/index.asp
But my special thanks to the
infestation and writings of Marshall Smith from whom I took a great deal of
information.
He has many other investigations that are interesting even if not religious in
nature.
Editor, BroJon Gazette
www.brojon.com
Richard
Salbato