Unofficial Letter, allegedly from the Congregation for the Faith, promoted by Charismatic Dennis Nolan and the fake nun Emmanuel, confirming and then contradicting the Church's rejection of Medjugorje.

 Do you believe the Church contradicts itself?


Pr. No 154/81-05922
Citta del Vaticano, Palazzo del S. Uffizio

May 26, 1998

To His Excellency Mons. Gilbert Aubry,
Bishop of Saint-Denis de la Reunion


In your letter of January 1, 1998, you submitted to this Dicastery several questions about the position of the Holy See and of the Bishop of Mostar in regard to the so called apparitions of Medjugorje, private pilgrimages and the pastoral care of the faithful who go there.

In regard to this matter, I think it is impossible to reply to each of the questions posed by Your Excellency. The main thing I would like to point out is that the Holy See does not ordinarily take a position of its own regarding supposed supernatural phenomena as a court of first instance. As for the credibility of the "apparitions" in question, this Dicastery respects what was decided by the bishops of the former Yugoslavia in the Declaration of Zadar, April 10, 1991: "On the basis of the investigations so far, it can not be affirmed that one is dealing with supernatural apparitions and revelations."

As for the credibility of the "apparitions" in question, this Dicastery respects what was decided by the bishops of the former Yugoslavia in the

Declaration of Zadar, April 10, 1991

Since the division of Yugoslavia into different independent nations it would now pertain to the members of the Episcopal Conference of Bosnia-Hercegovina to eventually reopen the examination of this case, and to make any new pronouncements that might be called for.

What Bishop Peric said in his letter to the Secretary General of "Famille Chretienne", declaring: "My conviction and my position is not only 'non constat de supernaturalitate,' but likewise, 'constat de non supernaturalitate' of the apparitions or revelations in Medjugorje", should be considered the expression of the personal conviction of the Bishop of Mostar which he has the right to express as Ordinary of the place, but which is and remains his personal opinion.

Finally, as regards pilgrimages to Medjugorje, which are conducted privately*, this Congregation points out that they are permitted on condition that they are not regarded as an authentification of events still taking place and which still call for an examination by the Church.

I hope that I have replied satisfactorily at least to the principal questions that you have presented to this Dicastery and I beg Your Excellency to accept the expression of my devoted sentiments.

Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone

* The Yugoslavian Bishops' Conference issued an order

prohibiting official pilgrimages to Medjugorje.

An official pilgrimage was defined as

"any group organized to come to Medjugorje."

By only permitting "privately conducted pilgrimages" and NO promotion of Medjugorje as authentic, the Church is clearly saying

(to "those with ears to HEAR" and obedient hearts)

 "Non constat de supernaturalitate" and "constat de non supernaturalitate"

"Nothing supernatural" has occurred in Medjugorje.

 Bishop Pavao Zanic's explicit Decree on The Medjugorje Hoax

 Chancellor Don Ante Laburic of Mostar: Fruits of Medjugorje

The Wanderer: "Film Probes Underside of Medjugorje Industry" 

 Unity Publishing - Navigation Bar

Unity Publishing - Our Lady of Guadalupe

      Get the Truth on the False Seers.

See the Fallen Angels Animated.

Search any page at Unity Publishing.

Unity Publishing - E-Mail Bar