Meeting of the Puppet-masters
Richard Salbato, March 28, 2011
On April 8th two hundred of the most influential leaders of
the world will meet in
They continue to believe that the greatest enemy to their goal of controlling the world with money is nationalism. They have used the nationalistic system somewhat to their advantage by backing their candidates with millions of dollars of funds so they could have a puppet in office to do their bidding.
But with so many countries throughout the world that is a lot of puppets to finance and to control. To understand these multibillionaires you have to understand that there are two kinds of millionaires but only one way to create real wealth for the world.
The Good millionaires and the Bad millionaires
Federal Unions want to blame millionaires for their problems across
When someone produces something that others buy they use money to buy the product, and the very production is what creates the money. In the free market a dollar of production creates two and a half dollars in national wealth as it moves throughout the system. Because of this, I do not believe that productive companies should be taxed at all, and in fact they cannot be taxed. A tax is part of their cost of production and they will just pass that on to the buyer. A good example of this is the much attacked Oil Companies that pay 40% taxes on their production of wealth just to the Federal Government, not to count lease payments and State Taxes. We the people pay for this in the price we pay for gas. Eliminate all taxes on oil companies and all the million stock holder owners of them and we would be paying $2.00 a gallon for gas.
However, when the owner of this company takes money from the company for his own use, house, boat, car, etc. then he should be taxed and heavily taxed because this is not productive for the entire society. These are the good millionaires and even the 401 holders of stock that go up but they do not take out the profits.
The bad millionaires do not produce anything. They make their money by bribing government officials to get tax payer’s money for doing government contracts that they charge twice as much for or get government exemptions from tax by loopholes they created and paid for. Obama is in the pocket of GE and although GE made two and one half billion dollars last year, they paid no tax.
The other way that bad millionaires make money is by taking it from people who loose it. They manipulate the money market, the commodity market, or the stock market day by day, hour by hour and even minute by minute to make billions of dollars per day. In these markets, no one makes one penny unless someone else looses. So no real wealth is created. Good examples of this are the large banks that borrow billions from the Federal Reserve at .25% and lend the same money back to the Federal Government to buy bonds at 6.50% making 6.25% without investing one penny. Another example is the Federal Reserve spending two trillion dollars of our money without anyone knowing where it went. Like the Government Unions, these people spend millions of dollars on elections or bribes in order to make billions from the government. They own or make nothing but make their wealth by taking it without work from others.
A One World Government
These puppet masters have so far failed in most of their plans over the past 100 years. Examples of their failure: The International Monetary Fund was established to take over the natural resources of poorer countries. Then lent money to countries that they knew they could not pay back and took for collateral the natural resources of water, gas, wood or whatever was the primary wealth of the country. But as these bankrupt nations restructured with new governments they refused to pay the debts or to give up there wealth.
their attempt to take over
they are meeting again to create world without borders (no nations) called a
One World Government with them controlling all. This is being organized by
Obama’s puppet Master, George Soros. His idea of a world Government is communist
prefers international capitalism over state
capitalism and international capitalism has to be an unelected dictatorship
No one is reporting this meeting but that is not surprising. Most of the liberal news media is attending this meeting. And their puppets are attacking Fox News. (See Note: 2)
He also has a plan underway for the past two years to change the US Constitution. (See Note: 5)
Note One: Soros maps out his plan two years ago
By Dan Gainor
March 23, 2011
Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. (See Note 1 below) In two short weeks, he is going to start - and no one seems to have noticed.
On April 8, a group he's funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros's goal for such an event is to "establish new international rules" and "reform the currency system." It's all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for "a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order."
The event is bringing
together "more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought
leaders' to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank
and International Monetary Fund. Soros wants a new 'multilateral
system," or an economic system where
More than two-thirds of the slated speakers have direct ties to Soros. The billionaire who thinks "the main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat" is taking no chances.
Thus far, this global gathering has generated less publicity than a spelling bee. And that's with at least four journalists on the speakers list, including a managing editor for the Financial Times and editors for both Reuters and The Times. Given Soros's warnings of what might happen without an agreement, this should be a big deal. But it's not.
What is a big deal is that Soros is doing exactly what he wanted to do. His 2009 commentary pushed for "a new Bretton Woods conference, like the one that established the post-WWII international financial architecture." And he had already set the wheels in motion.
Just a week
before that op-ed was published, Soros had founded the
New York City-based Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), the group
hosting the conference set at the Mount Washington Resort, the very same hotel
that hosted the first gathering. The most recent INET conference was held at
This, too, is a gathering of Soros supporters. INET is bringing together prominent people like former U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown, former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker and Soros, to produce "a lot of high-quality, breakthrough thinking."
While INET claims more than 200 will attend, only 79 speakers are listed on its site - and it already looks like a Soros convention. Twenty-two are on Soros-funded INET's board and three more are INET grantees. Nineteen are listed as contributors for another Soros operation - Project Syndicate, which calls itself "the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries" reaching "456 leading newspapers in 150 countries." It's financed by Soros's Open Society Institute. That's just the beginning.
Note Two: Soros’ other puppets
GetUp, Avaaz, Greenpeace and MoveOn are all "Octopus arms" of the “Puppetmasters" George Soros, the
"The two co-founders of GetUp,
Harvard graduates Jeremy Heimans and David Madden,
both worked for the George Soros-funded MoveOn.org in the
David Madden was previously a consultant to the World Bank and
Jeremy Heimans previously consulted for the UN, OECD
The process is Fed Res and IMF which are all linked and controlled by the same NWO forces: lend money to bail out countries, then through organizations such as above they destabilize the economies / governments and then repossess or possess the resources of that country and manipulate the governments of those countries to conform to the agenda of the NWO Illuminati.
Note Three: Soros Plan for NWO
former, represented by the
While international cooperation on regulatory reform is difficult to achieve on a piecemeal basis, it may be attainable in a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order.
A new Bretton Woods conference, like the one that established the international financial architecture after World War II, is needed to establish new international rules, including treatment of financial institutions considered too big to fail and the role of capital controls. It would also have to reconstitute the International Monetary Fund to reflect better the prevailing pecking order among states and to revise its methods of operation.
addition, a new Bretton
Woods would have to reform the currency system. The postwar order, which
range of currencies included in the SDRs would have
to be widened even if some of the newly added currencies, including the renminbi, are not fully convertible. This would let the
international community press
One great advantage of SDRs is that they permit the international creation of money, which is particularly useful at times as now. The money could be directed to where it is most needed. A mechanism that allows rich countries that don't need additional reserves to transfer their allocations to those that do is readily available, using the IMF's gold reserves.
the world order will need to extend beyond the financial system and involve the
United Nations, especially Security Council membership. That process needs to
be initiated by the
system cannot survive in its present form, and the
The alternative is frightening, because a declining superpower losing both political and economic dominance but still preserving military supremacy is a dangerous mix.
used to be reassured by the generalization that democratic countries seek
peace. After the Bush presidency, that rule no longer
holds, if it ever did. In fact, democracy is in deep trouble in
Barack Obama has deployed the "confidence multiplier" and claims to
have contained the recession. But if there is a "double dip"
recession, Americans will become susceptible to all kinds of fear-mongering and
populist demagogy. If Obama fails, the next
Obama has the right vision. He believes in international cooperation, rather than the might-is-right philosophy of the Bush-Cheney era.
emergence of the Group of 20 as the primary forum of international cooperation
and the peer-review process agreed in
financial system did not collapse altogether. The Obama
For the time being, the Chinese public is willing to subordinate its individual freedom to political stability and economic advancement. But that may not continue indefinitely — and the rest of the world will never subordinate its freedom to the prosperity of the Chinese state.
George Soros is chairman of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Institute. His most recent book is "The Crash of 2008." © 2009 Project Syndicate (www.project-syndicate.org)
Note Four: Stop Fox News and the Tea Party
The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of “guerrilla warfare and sabotage” aimed at the Fox News Channel.
launched as a more traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its
monitoring of newspapers and other television networks and is narrowing its
focus to Fox and a handful of conservative
websites, which its leaders view as political organizations and the “nerve
center” of the conservative movement. The shift reflects the centrality of the
cable channel to the contemporary conservative movement, as well as the
loathing it inspires among liberals
— not least among the donors who fund Media Matters’ staff of about 90, who are
arrayed in neat rows in a giant war room above
“The strategy that we had had toward Fox was basically a strategy of containment,” said Brock, Media Matters’ chairman and founder and a former conservative journalist, adding that the group’s main aim had been to challenge the factual claims of the channel and to attempt to prevent them from reaching the mainstream media.
The new strategy, he said, is a “war on Fox.”
In an interview and a 2010 planning memo shared with POLITICO, Brock listed the fronts on which Media Matters — which he said is operating on a $10 million-plus annual budget — is working to chip away at Fox and its parent company, News Corp. They include its bread-and-butter distribution of embarrassing clips and attempts to rebut Fox points, as well as a series of under-the-radar tactics.
Media Matters, Brock said, is assembling opposition research files not only on Fox’s top executives but on a series of midlevel officials. It has hired an activist who has led a successful campaign to press advertisers to avoid Glenn Beck’s show. The group is assembling a legal team to help people who have clashed with Fox to file lawsuits for defamation, invasion of privacy or other causes. And it has hired two experienced reporters, Joe Strupp and Alexander Zaitchik, to dig into Fox’s operation to help assemble a book on the network, due out in 2012 from Vintage/Anchor. (In the interest of full disclosure, Media Matters last month also issued a report criticizing “Fox and Friends” co-host Steve Doocy’s criticism of this reporter’s blog.)
Media Matters also plans to run a broad campaign against Fox’s parent company,
News Corp., an effort which most likely will involve opening a
At least three White House advisers and officials, including President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, have ties to an effort funded by billionaire George Soros to push for a new, "progressive" U.S. Constitution.
first reported last week that Sunstein's wife,
Samantha Power, has been a champion of a Soros-funded doctrine, entitled
"responsibility to protect," which was used by Obama to justify
engaging in an international military alliance to bomb
Now it has emerged that Sunstein has maintained extensive ties to Soros' funding, particularly with regard to a movement that openly seeks to create a "progressive" consensus as to what the U.S. Constitution should provide for by the year 2020.
Also, Attorney General Eric Holder sat on the board of a Soros-funded group pushing the same "progressive" constitution.
WND has learned
that in April 2005, Sunstein opened up a conference
That event was
sponsored by Soros' Open Society Institute as well as by the Center for
American Progress, which is led by
The Yale event on the Constitution was also sponsored by the American Constitution Society, or ACS, which has been described as a group meant to counter the work of the Federalist Society, which has been at the forefront of the push for a more conservative judiciary since its launch in 1982.
The ACS is the main organization behind the movement to ensure a more "progressive" constitution, having received more that $2,201,500 from Soros' Open Society since 2002.
Attorney General Holder served on the ACS board of directors.
(Story continues below)
Sunstein has spoken at numerous ACS events. For example, he was a speaker at a November 3, 2003 symposium by the American Constitution Society of the University of Chicago School of Law, where Sunstein was a professor.
But it was the 2005 Yale event led in part by Sunstein that has been described as jumpstarting the movement for a "progressive" constitution.
New 'Bill of Rights'
The Constitution 2020 movement has plotted a strategy for how liberal lawyers and judges might bring such a constitutional regime into being.
Just before his appearance at the Yale conference, Sunstein wrote a blog entry in which he explained he "will be urging that it is important to resist, on democratic grounds, the idea that the document should be interpreted to reflect the view of the extreme right-wing of the Republican Party."
Sunstein has also been pushing for a new socialist-style
According to Sunstein's new bill of rights, the
All this and more is contained in Sunstein's 2004 book, "The Second Bill of Rights: FDR'S Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever."
In the work, Sunstein advanced the radical notion that welfare rights, including some controversial inceptions, be granted by the state. His inspiration for a new bill of rights came from President Roosevelt's 1944 proposal of a different, new set of rights.
In his book, Sunstein laid out what he wants to become the new bill of rights, which he calls the Second Bill of Rights:
His mandates include the following:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return that will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home:
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
On one page in his book, Sunstein claims he is "not seriously arguing" his bill of rights be "encompassed by anything in the Constitution," but on the next page he states that "if the nation becomes committed to certain rights, they may migrate into the Constitution itself."
Later in the
book, Sunstein argues that "at a minimum, the
second bill should be seen as part and parcel of
With research by Brenda J. Elliott
Note Six: Signs of Deliberate American Bankruptcy
Note Seven: The Incompetent Puppet President
Note Eight: The Age of People Power
Note Nine: The Coming Sunni-Shiite War
Note Ten: After America's Bankruptcy
Note Eleven; New plan to Stop Tea Party
Note Twelve: The World is Bankrupt Now
Note Thirteen: Is Obama Having a Mental Breakdown